Update from the
Heartland
No.771
19.9.16 – 25.9.16
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To all,
The follow-up news items:
-- Independent, open-source investigators with Bellingcat
believe they have calculated the launch site location of the Russian Buk Mark 1
Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) system (NATO: SA-11) that shot down Malaysian
Airlines flight MH17 (17.July.2014) [657,
665, 722]. They believe the
missile that brought down MH17 was fired from a field south of the town of
Snizhne, in the contested Donetsk region of Eastern Ukraine – in rebel-held
territory. So, whether a Russian
or a rebel crew fired the fatal missile is immaterial. The Russians either fired or supplied
the Buk SAM system to whoever fired the missile. It is my opinion only, since I cannot prove it, that the
Russians operated that SAM system and fired the fatal missile in an airspace
denial operation on behalf of the so-called rebels in Donetsk.
Reconstruction of
MH17 Cockpit
[File: MH17
contruct.jpg]
[Photo credit: Getty
Images]
In the associated, FYI category: I chose to add the MH17 image
above for one reason only. This is
a near perfect example of what happens to an aircraft that is hit by an SAM,
like the Russian Buk SAM system, which is roughly equivalent to the U.S.
Standard and Patriot SAM systems. Note
the numerous penetrations on the upper left side and the shredding in that area
of the fuselage (compared to the almost pristine lower fuselage). This image is exactly why I have
contended a U.S. Navy Standard missile could NOT have brought down TWA 800 (17.July.1996)
– the associated damage would have been virtually impossible to cover-up.
-- A French appeals court ordered former Société
Générale trader Jérôme Kerviel to pay €1M (US$1.12M) to his former
employer. As part of his sentencing
in October 2010, a French court ordered Kerviel to repay the €4.9B to the bank –
the amount the bank lost in the affair.
Kerviel argued that he could not bear sole responsibility for the bank's
entire loss from unauthorized, risky trades in 2008 [353, 460], so the latest
court ruling was quite a recovery for Kerviel. The legal wrangling continues between Kerviel and his former
employer. This was one of the
precursor events for the Great Recession.
What
is it that is so hard for some folks to comprehend . . . compliance with a law
enforcement officer’s orders is the best course of response, especially when
the officer involved is aiming his pistol at you. Non-compliance, no matter how passively aggressive such
conduct might be, is a threatening action in that the officer has no idea what
the subject is thinking, his intentions, what weapons he has access to until he
is cleared and secured. The
non-compliance threat has absolutely nothing to do with the pigmentation of a
subject’s skin. Now, we could
argue, why is the law enforcement officer aiming his pistol at someone? The reality is, the reason does NOT
matter. S/he feels threatened from
some reason – situation, intelligence, action, whatever – it does not
matter. Many years ago, on a
traffic stop, proper or not, I always got out my automobile and moved to the
curb side of the car – out of respect for the officer being exposed on the
street side. Then, one day,
decades ago, a police officer barked at me to stay in the car. I did exactly as he instructed me to
do. Rather than rioting, perhaps
community instruction sessions would be useful. Every citizen, regardless of skin pigmentation or apparel,
should simply comply with instructions from a law enforcement officer. I believe that there would be near zero
of these controversial officer-involved shooting if the subject simply complied
with the officer’s instructions.
News from the economic
front:
-- The Bank of Japan announced an interest-rate target for
10-year government bonds, as part of a new policy framework to achieve its
inflation objective of at least 2% annually. The central bank also indicated it would continue
quantitative easing until the target is met. After the bank’s announcement, the yield on the 10-year
Japanese government bond briefly rose above zero for the first time since
March.
-- The Federal Reserve left short-term interest rates
unchanged. In the central bank’s
public statement, they said, “The [Fed] judges that the case for an increase in
the federal funds rate has strengthened but decided, for the time being, to
wait for further evidence of continued progress toward its objectives.” The statement suggests there are internal
divisions within the policy committee that leave the potential for a rate hike before
year-end.
Comments and contributions from Update no.770:
Comment to the Blog:
“Maybe I just don't take the presidential race quite as
seriously as others with political interests. One reason is that either of the
two major-party candidates will face a hostile Congress upon winning. Trump has
been publicly disowned by enough Republicans that we might best consider him as
an outsider who has taken the GOP nomination. However, should he achieve
election, he's unlikely to accomplish anything the Republican Establishment
opposes. Clinton continues to be popular with the Democratic Establishment who,
however, do not control Congress and are gradually splitting along progressive
versus centrist lines. (Regardless of platform statements, Clinton will act as
a centrist. Her funding sources will permit nothing more.) Either of those two
aligns with Wall Street, and either will permit the ‘too big to fail’ banks to
bring the economy to its knees again. Neither will be able to repair our
international image as a bully with a pitiful side. And neither will act on the
climate issues that will ultimately make life far harder for everyone on the
planet.”
My response to the
Blog:
That
seems like a particularly cynical perspective; however, I must confess, you may
well be correct; it is definitely plausible given the reality of what we have
endured this silly season. I
certainly hope you are wrong, no matter who becomes the 45th POTUS, but
regrettably, I suspect you are closer to being correct than wrong.
It
is most unfortunate and a serious disservice to the citizens of this Grand
Republic that the federal Commission on Presidential Debates cannot find a more
reasonable and representative threshold, or just ignore their money masters and
do the right thing. We need Gary
Johnson and Jill Stein to be in those debates . . . a full 4-way. As we approach the first debate, a week
away, we know they will not be in the first debate, and I suspect they are not
likely to “qualify” for any of the debates. CNN has been the only major news source that has given the
Libertarian and Green Party candidates a national / international stage. I hope they can find the courage to do
that again in the last two months of this silly season. If nothing else, have Johnson and Stein
debate each other.
Another contribution:
“Re: Herr Drumpf, the foreign policy establishment - both R’s
and D’s - are becoming united against him. And he has already caused a lot of damage to the United
States with his comments. That is
clear.
“From the Post - Eliot Cohen, an active anti-Trump voice,
said that he has never seen foreign-policy professionals so stridently hostile
to a candidate.
“He is not only an ignoramus, but he’s a dangerous ignoramus
who doesn’t know the first thing about foreign policy and doesn’t care and has
some very dangerous instincts,” Cohen, who served in the George W. Bush
administration, told The Washington Post in a recent interview. “Part of what
is so dangerous about him is not just his ignorance and contempt for our
alliances, but his failure to understand how important these have been to our
security since 1945. And he has already done a lot of damage. Our allies are
deeply shaken by this election.”
----------------------------------------------------
My reply:
Herr
Drumpf indeed!
Subscribers
and readers of this humble forum are shaken by the lack of respect and dignity
in this particular silly season.
Unfortunately, it is the outrageousness of one particular candidate that
has stimulated and attracted so many American citizens that apparently support
that outrageousness – let’s shake this place down to the bricks attitude – have
told the myriad pollsters they support his drivel. We cannot say anything about the votes he got in the
primaries, since far too many state primaries were open primaries and votes for
him could have just as easily been Democrat leaning voters seeking a Republican
candidate they figured would be easiest to beat in November; we cannot separate
real votes from anti votes. The
same with polls, frankly. People
can and do say what they want the pollsters to hear. The only way we are going to determine the end of this is by
our votes on 8.November . . . and even then, I think what he has done will have
lasting effects. I suppose we
ceased to be a nation of debate, negotiation, and compromise . . . oh, perhaps
we could peg the transformation at Nixon’s paranoia and crimes, or maybe even
Johnson’s foolish and costly attempt to do just enough . . . who knows.
As
I did in the 70’s, when so much was going wrong, I have to maintain my faith in
this Grand Republic. We shall
endure no matter who becomes POTUS.
I would prefer not to return to those ugly days of the 60’s and 70’s,
but I have faith we shall overcome.
A different
contribution:
“Also, Trump exploiting fear and hate to gain power is exactly
what Hitler did, and what every demagogue does.”
My response:
“Quite so.”
One last contribution:
“At least [Trump]
got the media to give him free coverage of the people who support him … clever
move!”
My reply:
Yes,
indeed. We must give him credit
for that. He has played the media
quite well.
My
very best wishes to all. Take care
of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
3 comments:
I'll add a comment on law enforcement and their commands. I have a hearing loss in my right ear that doesn't impede normal conversation at all and a bit of an auditory processing issue the usually doesn't cause trouble either. Between the two, the shouted commands of police officers sound a great deal like a dog barking. They don't appreciate me asking, "Could you repeat that a little more clearly?" or something similar, but I have had to do that. I cannot be the only one. I'll add that I was blessed with very specific training to be very afraid of any law enforcement officer, and I believe that in itself has saved my life more than once. Respect for them is not part of me, though. Even the best of them is simply earning a paycheck most of the time.
One small potential mitigating factor in the prospect of a Trump Presidency is that he may not plan to do the actual work of governing. He is, after all is said and done, one more "trust fund baby." During the "pick a Vice President" segment of this terrible reality show, we heard here in Ohio that Trump had offered our Governor Kasich the job with a stipulation that the Vice President would take charge of both foreign and domestic policy. Kasich, who is not as dumb as he seems, turned it down. Indiana's Mike Pence took the position. I doubt Trump's Vice President, Governor Pence, would govern well, but anyone the least bit in touch with reality would do better than Trump.
The origins of our current quagmire can be debated, but the turning point was the Reagan Presidency. That was when government officials successfully turned public opinion against government.
PS: I looked at Mike Pence's biography in Wikipedia and noticed this sentence: "During Pence's twelve years in the House, he introduced 90 bills and resolutions; none became law.[42]" He seems very unsuccessful as a legislator.
Calvin,
I have not heard of any police officer defaulting to the pistol-drawn level at the get-go without probable cause. I have never had a law enforcement officer draw and aim his weapon at me. I have always treated and responded to law enforcement officers with respect and dignity. I must also confess, there have been a few police officers in my life that were not demonstrating reciprocal respect. I did not react to their antagonistic attitude. If you do not give a law enforcement officer a reason to feel threatened . . . by acting suspiciously, nervously or aggressively.
Re: Herr Drumpf AKA “Manhattan Mussolini.” I do not know whether such reports are true or valid, but let us assume they are. There are some tasks that are not delegate-able, e.g., the nuclear launch codes. One thing in Pence’s favor; he has a more stable, calm and measured personality and conduct than the presidential nominee.
Re: turning point. Reagan – perhaps. I will argue at least Nixon and more probably Johnson served at that turning point to my knowledge and understanding. Someone . . . some day . . . will help us overcome this deeply corrosive nonsense. Government is not the enemy. I could launch into a lengthy tirade on this subject alone, but I shall resist . . . to avoid boring you and everyone else.
Re: Pence the legislator. I think you will find that many, if not all, have similar ratios of successfully passed legislation to introduced bills. Some bills are introduced just to get “credit” with their contributors.
“That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment