28 July 2014

Update no.658

Update from the Heartland
No.658
21.7.14 – 27.7.14
To all,

The follow-up news items:
-- The situation in Eastern Ukraine continues to fester and deteriorate [640, 657].  Now, we have reports of the Russians firing artillery and rockets into the Ukraine in support of the “separatists” and so-called “rebels.”  If true, it is an act of war.
            At least, the Netherlands and Australia were able to recover the remains of most of the victims of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH-17 [657] and transport them to Endhoven Air Base for forensic identification.  The “rebels” are playing quite a lot of power-trip games with the investigators.  Close-up images of parts reportedly among the MH-17 wreckage certainly appear to have numerous penetrations – consistent with a fragmentary warhead from a missile.  Clearly, the Russians (Putin) do not want anyone to know the truth.  We need to know who ordered the shoot and who pulled the trigger (or pushed the button or turned the launch key) to establish criminal culpability. 
            I think the Buk Mk-I (SA-11) SAM platform that shot down MH-17 was owned by either Ukraine or Russia.  The missile(s) was fired in Ukrainian rebel held territory.  I doubt Ukrainian separatists had the knowledge, skill or training to operate a sophisticated SAM system like the Buk Mk-I – it is not a simple point and shoot weapon.  MH-17 was in cruise flight at FL330 (33,000 feet) – not an easy target to find or identify.  Regardless of where the missiles or launcher came from, I suspect a Russian crew under Russian orders operated the launcher.  Whoever fired that missile, it was an irresponsible act.  So, whether it was a stolen launcher operated by an ill-trained and improperly controlled crew, or a Russian launcher with a Russian crew, Putin remains the instigator.  He is ultimately responsible.
-- The situation in Gaza [657] remains quite tenuous.  Cease fire, no cease-fire, who knows?  Israel is taking heat for an artillery strike on a UN school / sanctuary.  Why are the Press and public condemning Israel?  Did anyone “see” what led up to the strike?  Hamas terrorists repeatedly have attacked Israel from Gaza.  So, is this conflict all about who can generate the most “civilian” casualties on their side to invoke public sympathy?  It is truly tragic that innocent Palestinian citizens in Gaza must endure the brutality of Israeli attacks all because the Hamas militant wing is bent upon Israel’s destruction.  The solution is quite simple – respect each other and live in peace.

A friend and frequent contributor sent along this article:
“Global Warming Denial Linked To... Speaking English?”
by Chris Mooney
Posted: 07/23/2014 1:47 pm EDT; Updated: 07/23/2014 1:59 pm EDT
Interesting hypothesis!
 . . . to which he added:
“Hypothesis? Correlation at the very least. More than one study has found that viewers of Fox News have a less accurate picture of the world than those who watch no news at all.”
 . . . and I replied:
So you say.  I'm not convinced as to correlation, and I speak English, so I guess that explains my reticence.

On Sunday, 27.July.2014, the wreckage of SS Costa Concordia [527] arrived in Genova, Italia, after being erected [614] and towed for salvage – one hellava engineering achievement.  Hopefully, during the salvage process, they will find the remains of the Russel Rebello, the last missing person from the cruise ship capsizing disaster.  Most folks may remember the accident.  However, I doubt very many care about or are even aware of the engineering that went into just the parbuckling operation [614] – the most complex and sophisticated salvage operation in human history.  We should all offer our congratulations to the engineering and salvage team for their accomplishment.  Well done, everyone!

Comments and contributions from Update no.657:
“A couple of points.  Speaking of soccer (football) went to a Sporting KC game this week- great game and venue.  You should get to a game. A soccer stadium built specifically for that game- and full of rabid fans.  SKC beat the LA Galaxy, 2-1.
“Regarding the operation in Gaza, there is a bit more to the story.   After the three Israeli youth were kidnapped, the IDF went into Gaza, ostensibly looking for them.  It has come to light that the Government knew the three had been killed very soon after their abduction- and they were found in a field about three weeks after they were taken.  From where they were found, it was odd that they hadn’t been found before.  The IDF apparently used the search for the youths as a pretext for operations- and that led to the firing from Gaza.  Now the IDF has gone into Gaza in force, and things are getting ugly.  And the Arab boy that was murdered in retaliation for the deaths of the three Israeli youth was burned alive.  To add to that, two Arab youth had been killed about a month before this all started, in dodgy circumstances- but with no one held culpable.  This all shows how things can spiral out of control very quickly. 
“On MH17, an odd factoid has arisen. Apparently the MH17 flight on that day was flying about 300 miles off the usual course for that flight.  It isn’t clear why, was it weather or what.  But why was the plane flying that far off the normal route and into more dangerous territory?
“And remember the VINCENNES shootdown-initially we denied responsibility, only to find out that our ship had made a horrible mistake.”
My reply:
            Indeed.  We really should attend an SKC match.  I’ve always enjoyed futbol.  We’ve gone up to KC for several Chiefs games, so there is no excuse.
            Re: Gaza.  There are always two sides of every coin.  Indeed, things have been spiraling out of control for decades, approaching a century, in that area.  OK, who took the three Israeli boys, and why?  That appears to be the catalytic event of this latest episode.
            Re: MH-17.  I am a little suspicious of the 300 mile off course information.  To my knowledge, MH-17 was in radar coverage under active air traffic control.  I have not flown an aircraft over Ukraine or Russia, so I do not have first hand knowledge, but it is my understanding flight paths are strictly monitored and controlled over that part of the world.  ATC jumps on folks who deviate in far smaller amounts from planned/cleared airways.  If it was off planned track, I do not know why.  The investigators should figure out that part in short order.
            Re: Iran Air 655.  Yes, there was initial denial.  The Vincennes crew truly believed they had an active threat that was unresponsive to challenge calls.  Whether the Iran Air 655 crew heard or ignored the challenges will never be known; they did not respond.  I suspect when we hear the CVR data (assuming is has not been compromised) I suspect we will not see any warning or challenge.
Round two:
“Yes, and get your tickets well before the game- with their success, (they are MSL champions and are leading their division) tickets are at a premium.  BTW, with Die Mannschaft winning the cup, it is fußball!! 
“Also went to the WWI Memorial- if you haven’t gone there, or haven’t been in a while, it is a worthwhile trip.  Esp now on the century anniversary of the end of WWI.  There is a special
“Be Home by Christmas” exhibit now.
“On MH17- I can’t find it now, but saw a flight-tracker of the flight that indicated that it was off the normal flight route track. No ideas why, and concur that the flight should have been under control and would have had to have been routed there.  Another question to answer, as to why it was off the normal flight route.
“Good question on who kidnapped and killed the three Israeli boys.  Haven’t heard much on that in a while.  The suspects were originally described as two or three from a clan that is somewhat estranged from the PA and Hamas- they apparently have a record of going off the reservation.  Also question why it took so long for the bodies to be found.  The IDF seemed to be using the search for the youth as a pretext for search and destroy – which in turn led to rockets, which led to the incursion into Gaza.   There are a number of questions around that aspect.
“Also re the FAA and some European airlines cancelling flights.  Don’t blame them, in light of MH17.  Hamas had sent communications to the airlines, saying that they were going to target Ben Gurion.  So it was prudent to halt flights.  Also a bit of two-facedness on the Israeli side. On one hand they are saying the reason that they are going into Gaza and having the operation is because Israel is being bombarded by rockets (thank goodness, to not much avail.)  Now when the airlines quit flying, they are saying that all is ok and they are safe as can be. Can’t have it both ways.   And worse, if the Gaza operation continues much longer, Hitzbollah, in Lebanon, might start shooting rockets at Israel- and they have much more powerful rockets and would surely target the airport.”
  . . . my reply to round two:
            Re: futbol.  I switched to Spanish rather than German.  I tend to mix them up in usage, to differentiate soccer from football.
            Re: WW1 museum & memorial.  Absolutely.  It is on my “ride” list of targets.
            Re: MH-17.  I do not know the ATC rules over Ukraine.  I know in the U.S. & E.U., ATC would not tolerate that sort of deviation without clearance.  We do not yet know if they were cleared to deviate.  Even when cleared “direct,” they still get huffy when you deviate from your expected track.  Perhaps they are more liberal in their control of flight tracks over there.  Don’t know!
            Re: Palestine. I don’t know who got the Palestinian boy either, but probably retribution by a Jewish rogue group.  So then, Hamas starts launching rockets into Israel.  So, now hundreds of people die on both sides because of some rogue, criminal groups.  Insanity!
            Re: flight ban.  Yes, given MH-17, quite understandable.  Yet, it is precisely what Hamas sought, which will do nothing but encourage them to try harder.  Just like al-Qa’ida, go after the transportation system to cripple a modern economy.
            Re: Hezbollah.  I think they have already fired a few rockets, but nothing major.  More sophisticated rockets . . . yes, it is much easier for the IRI to resupply Hezbollah than Hamas.
Round three:
“Concur..not sure if IRI supplies Hamas…esp now as Hamas is Sunni.  Hitzbollah is Shi’a, like Iran. But Hitzbollah’s leader made comments of support for Hamas and indicated they might start in.  If so, that would be a huge game changer.”
 . . . my reply to round three:
            Since 1979, the IRI has remained at the pinnacle of state sponsors of terrorism.  In that time, their objective has been and remains the elimination of Israel.  They have supplied arms and other supplies to anyone willing to attack Israel – Hamas qualifies.  The Israeli Navy intercepted and boarded several ships transporting a wide variety of weapons from Iran to Gaza.
            Rumblings have already begun on the West Bank.  I suspect Hezbollah is not far behind.
            We shall see how this plays out.
Round four:
“This article just came out on the VINCENNES case….FYI
“As I recall – from Navy JAG colleagues, the Captain of the ship was considered a bit of a loose cannon.  They were not happy with him.”
 . . . my reply to round four:
            The information we have is the same . . . a bit of a Rambo-type with an Aegis-class cruiser as his weapon.  There were sufficient circumstances around the event; it was very shades of grey.

Comment to the Blog:
“With respect to Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, I doubt very much that Putin would have ordered such a thing in any direct way. Your statements that the rebels are his creatures are not well supported as of now, but there's a simpler reason. Putin is not stupid enough to order a move that would turn the entire world against him. That is the predictable result of attacking unarmed and uninvolved craft that were following the appropriate directives and is what has happened. Whether the rebels are essentially independent lunatics/incompetents or are merely a poor choice of tools by Putin, we may not assume insane stupidity on Putin's part without considerably more evidence. The shoot-down was most likely a mistake. Time will tell whose mistake it was.
“The true fate of Flight 800 is likely to remain unknown until some future time when historians gain access to the information, as most such controversies do. By that time, the only effect it will have on society will be to deepen the cynicism of history students like me.
“Your linked article by Mr. Kagan of the Washington Post fails to account for two major factors. First, the Vietnam event cost much more than the immediate loss of United States lives and treasure. The harm to the United States image worldwide continues to this day. The disillusionment at home paired with that of the Watergate scandal caused permanent damage to Americans' view of our political system that I think has led to much of the conflict between people who grew up before those two events versus those roughly my age and younger who came along during or after those events and were permanently affected by them. On top of that, the effects of that conflict on Vietnam veterans and the United States government's shameful treatment of those veterans have rippled nationally and continue to do so.
“The other factor not recognized by Mr. Kagan is simply that the United States is not only not responsible for leading/policing the developed world today but has lost both the leadership and the capacity to sustain it. We are today neither the most prosperous nation by most measures nor the most socially advanced. Measures that seek to understand “happiness” leave us in the dust. Let those who benefit by leadership exercise it.
“Citigroup has made another civil settlement for their wrongdoing. Even if they complain about it, “too little, too late” still applies.
“In reference to the Middle East, the Pax Romana never truly took hold there per many sources and the Pax Brittania came to grief as well. The Babylonians failed before those two and we have failed since, as has the UN. The Mongolians probably did better than the others, but only in a relative way. The area from the Jordan to the Mediterranean has seen conflict ever since the Canaanites (ancestors of the Jews) returned from Egypt to find others living in what had been their territory. I cannot suggest a rational way to end that conflict.
“In reference to the debate over ‘death with dignity,’ I know several of the disabled and may fall into that category myself soon. Abuse of such laws concerns us. In addition, I am well acquainted with quite a number of people whose heirs are untrustworthy to the point of shortening lives for their own benefit. I also spent several months last year doing what I could to support a man who died of lung cancer following a long bout with throat cancer. Thus, I can understand more of the sides of this debate than most. Today, I stand in favor of some sort of death with dignity process but with very stringent controls.
“Also, whatever results from the death with dignity debate, suicide is a separate issue. Laws against the actions of those who are dead are ludicrous, and those who attempt suicide, whether or not we see them as “serious,” need other kinds of help, not prosecution.”
My response to the Blog:
            Re: MH-17.  I agree.  There is no evidence of and I do not suspect Putin ordered the shoot down of MH-17.  I do believe Putin did order Russian military and special forces to support a publicly perceived separatist movement in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine to carve off more territory for Russia.  Whether he specifically and expressly ordered Buk Mk-1 (SA-11) SAM units into Eastern Ukraine to provide air defense for the “separatists” may not be known for many years.  The publicly available information strongly suggests the Russians directly enabled those SAM units either by direct operation (as Soviet pilots did in North Korea and North Vietnam) or they inadequately trained the “separatists” to a sufficient level to launch a missile at a target – any target.   Yes, I doubt anyone intended to shoot down a scheduled commercial aircraft in transit.  There is no doubt in my mind that Putin is supporting directly the “separatist” movement in Eastern Ukraine – his surrogate for Russian expansion.
            Re: TWA 800.  Probably so.
            Re: Kagan.  Vietnam was a complicated history in a complicated time.  Yes, he did not wax on expansively about Vietnam or the political complication of Watergate.  I am not sure what your point is relative to his central topic?  As we discussed before, we do not share the same assessment of the future for this Grand Republic.  The issue is, where do we draw the line with the use of force?
            Re: Citigroup.  Agreed . . . hardly punishment for those corporate officers who made the decisions and/or enabled those actions.
            Re: Pax Romana.  As with so many of our discussions, definitions become vital to perception.  There were centuries of commerce and comparatively good standard of living.  Sure, those times were not without crime or tensions, but it was a time of prosperity for many, not all, in the context of those days.  Peace will only come when they accept the geographic reality and respect each other, so that they can move on to focus on the future of their land and people.
            Re: Death with Dignity.  Concern with such questions is healthy.  We should all be concerned.  I have a goodly portion of examples of malicious relatives or relations in such circumstances.  The system must provide those protections.  It is absolutely a condition when such authority cannot and must never be delegated.  If an individual does not have demonstrable and recordable mental and emotional competency for such decisions, then they do not qualify, period.  I absolutely agree . . . with stringent controls; however, those controls or administration of the process must not become de facto prohibitive.  We are talking about citizens at their end of days, and allowing each individual the choice of death with dignity, when appropriate.
            Re: suicide.  Here we go back to the shameful mental health treatment system in this country . . . or actually lack of same.  The law must stand squarely against suicide, but I have always thought the existing laws are meant more for “supporters” or “enablers” of such events.  This is part & parcel to the DwD process.  We must find the will to vastly improve our mental health care system.

My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)

21 July 2014

Update no.657

Update from the Heartland
No.657
14.7.14 – 20.7.14
To all,

Erratum:
“It is Messi, not Messier.”
            Indeed, many of you caught my literary faux pas.  To all, I offer my most humble apologies for misspelling the family name of Lionel Andrés “Leo” Messi – the forward for Spanish fútbol club FC Barcelona and the captain of the Argentina national team.  Thank you all for your diligence and constructive criticism.  I try to get it right, but clearly do not always succeed.  Again, my apologies!

We can always count on a flare up on the Israeli-Palestinian situation.  To my knowledge, this latest rendition of the perpetual conflict began with the brutal, tortuous murder of three Israeli teenage boys – one with a U.S. passport.  The boys disappeared on 12.June; they were found dead north of Hebron on 30.June.  The following Wednesday (2.July) a Palestinian boy walking home from morning prayers in the pre-dawn hours was abducted and murdered.  Shortly thereafter, Hamas militants in Gaza began lobbing a variety of homemade, Russian and Iranian rockets into Israel.  Despite valiant efforts by Egyptian diplomats to broker a ceasefire and negotiations, Israeli Defense Force ground units entered northern Gaza [17.July], going after Hamas rocket launchers and border infiltration tunnels.  Apparently, Hamas wants the people they are supposed to support and protect to be the victim; they want the Israelis to strike and they want as many women and children bloodied and killed to further their malicious purposes.  Now the question is how long will this violence last?

Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 disappeared from air traffic control radar while enroute from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, on an established airway in cruise flight at FL330 – above the briefed 32,000-foot ceiling over the conflict zone in Eastern Ukraine.  The time and date were: 16:20 [B], Thursday, 17.July.2014.  The wreckage and debris appears to be spread over a very long area near the village of Torez, Donetsk Region, Ukraine – roughly 30 miles from the border with Russia.  The size of the debris field is indicative of an in-flight break-up.  Given other uncorroborated information, there is very little doubt the commercial aircraft was shot down by a sophisticated Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM).  The rebels in the area have reportedly recovered the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), and both boxes were reportedly sent to Moscow.  Also, a Buk Mk-1 [NATO: SA-11] SAM launcher with 1 or 2 missiles missing was photographed being transported by flatbed truck to Russia.  I strongly suspect we will never see those items again.  Whether it was a mistake by ill-trained operators or a calculated intentional act, the fact remains 298 innocents lives were sacrificed at the altar of Putin’s ego.  MH17 was certainly not the first commercial aircraft to be shot down by military weapons.  Past major events:
-- 1.September.1983 – Korean Air Lines Flight 007 (B747-2B5B) shot down by Soviet Su-15 fighters just past Sakhalin Island after overflying Kamchatka without clearance, enroute from (New York) Anchorage to Seoul,
-- 3.July.1988 - Iran Air Flight 655 (A300B2-200) shot down by USS Vincennes (CG-49) enroute from Bandar Abbas to Dubai,
-- 4.October.2001 – Siberia Airlines Flight 1812 (Tu-154M) shot down by SAM fired from Crimean Peninsula, while aircraft was in cruise flight at FL360, enroute from Tel Aviv to Novosibirsk.
Unfortunately, they will not be the last.  Now, we add another incident.
            Those who claim the Russian-backed separatists or the Russians themselves had no motive to shoot down a commercial aircraft are apparently blind to reality.  Putin has been carving up the sovereign nation of Ukraine ever since the pro-Western rebellion ousted the Kremlin’s lackey Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych [23.February.2014].  There is also no doubt the Putin regime instigated the separatist movement in Eastern Ukraine as its surrogate to accomplish the carving with some modicum of plausible deniability.  Let us not be fooled by Putin propaganda.  Sure, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin may be a hapless victim of the nationalistic, glory-days forces he unleashed but he remains the leader, just as Josef Stalin was in his day.  Putin must keep sufficient mystery and uncertainty in any potential investigation to maintain that deniability.  I also suspect that if we were allowed to fully interrogate these so-called separatists we would find a substantial portion are FSB, MVD, GRU, Spetsnaz and other Russian special operators.  Putin’s plausible deniability is eroding rapidly.

Ironically, on the evening of 17.July, CNN broadcast its Special Report titled: Witnessed: The Crash of TWA Flight 800 – the 18th anniversary of what remains one of the most controversial in-flight explosions of a commercial airliner on a revenue mission.  There was nothing new in the report, just a different perspective of the same information.  The report offered an animation of the government’s hypothesis, but did not even mention the other hypotheses, including ours.  There was never a debate or even question about what happened once the combustible fuel-air vapor in the Center Wing Tank (CWT) ignited; well, we must exclude that bogus CIA animation intended to create a reasonable doubt with the witnesses.  The whole debate hangs upon what ignited the CWT vapors?  We cannot prove our hypothesis.  The U.S. Government (USG) has not proven their hypothesis.  We need the USG’s classified information to either prove one hypothesis or another, or disprove all other hypotheses (Occam’s Razor).  Regrettably, we may not see what the USG has concealed until 2046; I will be 98 years old.  I have to stay physically and mentally healthy to appreciate the information when we see it, to either apologize for getting it wrong, or close our hypothesis as a proven cause.

One of several authors to write on TWA 800, Jack Cashill, wrote an opinion piece and offered a proposal:
“Why Congress Must Reopen the TWA 800 Investigation”
by Jack Cashill
americanthinker.com
Published: July 7, 2014
While I agree and support Cashill’s proposal, I cannot imagine the NTSB reopening this case without the government’s classified material in the public domain.  Yet, altering evidence tags and removing or withholding evidence are by themselves criminal acts.  In this instance, the agency normally tasked with investigating federal felonious conduct is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).  Unfortunately, the FBI itself appears to be involved in committing the crime(s).  So, who will (can) investigate the FBI’s conduct?  As Cashill proposes, without a special prosecutor, only the Congress has that authority.

A related topic at times like these:
“U.S. needs a discussion on when, not whether, to use force”
by Robert Kagan
Washington Post
Published: July 15 [2014]
This is a perpetual question . . . whether a schoolyard bully or a rabid dictator.  When is it time?

News from the economic front:
-- Citigroup announced a deal with the USG to settle allegations it sold deficient mortgages that contributed to the financial crisis and led to the Great Recession. The US$7B deal includes US$4.5B in cash and US$2.5B in consumer mortgage relief. The cash portion consists of a US$4B civil monetary payment to the Justice Department and US$500M in compensatory payments to the associated state attorneys general and the FDIC.  Citigroup will also take a charge of about US$3.8B pretax in 2Q2014, which of course We, the People, pay for at the end of the day.
-- Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen testified before the Senate Banking Committee that she expected to maintain low interest rates, noting the U.S. economic recovery is “not yet complete” and the unemployment rate remains too high.
-- The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rose 7.5% from a year earlier in 2Q2014, up from 7.4% growth in 1Q2014.  The growth in the world's second-largest economy has apparently stabilized after a slowdown earlier this year.

Comments and contributions from Update no.656:
Comment to the Blog:
“In reference to the under-age refugees from Central America, you make a statement that they come here for , ‘. . . a better life. Most of the rest of the world could have the same objective.’ While that holds true for Central America, it no longer applies to the ‘developed’ world, including for example Chile, Argentina, and Brazil. Like it or not, we have fallen behind many nations in many social and economic measures of well-being, and most of the global population knows that.
“The sentence, ‘The challenge for us is sorting out the genuine threatened and oppressed from those who are looking for the angle’ brings us back to duality. What makes you believe that either the children or their parents are one thing or another? The foundation of duality is this kind of over-simplification. I would be astounded of most of these people did not find strong motivation in both of those factors.
“I agree in remarkable detail with your statement on the Town of Greece v. Galloway Supreme Court decision bearing on prayer at government functions. However, you refer to ‘bad men’ in the clergy; I tend to see them as thoughtless and/or misguided but not ‘bad’ at some deep level. I imagine most of them do some good for their congregations and many for the larger community as well. They just fail to understand the issues of non-Christians and the Christians who disagree with them. The fact that I am myself clergy probably bears on my opinion. Other than that phrase, we are in striking agreement.
“In reference to Justice Thomas, he is noted for keeping silence almost all the time in the proceedings of the Supreme Court. This opinion demonstrates the reason for that. He simply does not have the intellect required of the legal profession. His reference to conditions preceding the Constitution, in this instance, refers to things the Framers specifically sought to change. Therefore, the existence of those state-established religions does not support his position. The fact that he also fails to understand the purpose of the Bill of Rights reinforces the fact that he is incapable of performing the role in which he finds himself. He should continue in silence if he will not resign and has not been removed thus far.
“Mother Nature continues to show her displeasure. While the West bakes and burns, the Great Lakes and Midwest continue to have increased rain and occasional violent storms. This aggravates the economic doldrums as well as causing unhappiness and health issues.”
My response to the Blog:
            Re: U.S.A. hope.  I do not have quite such a diminished view of our economic hope or potential.
            Re: “What makes you believe that either the children or their parents are one thing or another?  It is simply a reflection that we must define a threshold of immigration worthiness – yes or no.  If that establishes a duality in the context of our previous discussions, then so be it.  To me, it is simply a decision mechanism.  Threatened and oppressed . . . again, a threshold must be established for proper decision-making.  No country, including this Grand Republic, can afford open borders – accept all comers.
            Re: bad men among clergy.  Parochialism, supremacy and exclusivity among some clerics put them in that negative category, in my humble opinion.  One more observation, I suspect if the Christian majority continues to press its numerical advantage, they will find increased resistance, despite the Supremes’ tendency.  Even Stalin & Hitler had good achievements, but those good things cannot mitigate the profound negative impact on human history.
            Re: Thomas.  I am not a fan of Associate Justice Thomas.  I very rarely find affinity with his reasoning.  Yet, I am not so hard on him either.  He is apparently a product of the Bob Bork school of strict constructionist originalism.  Even if so, I still disagree with him, for the reason you cite.  If one sees the Constitution as a definition of federal authority only, then I suppose it is understandable how he reaches his reasoning.  To me, there is a very specific, real, substantive reason the Framers began the preamble with “We, the People.”  Thomas apparently fails to appreciate that subtlety.
            Re: Mother Nature.  Has anyone considered that our view of Mother Nature’s wrath may be a product of vastly enhanced, instant communications?  Weather at any locale has cycled and been subjected to happenstance.
Round two:
“Some of the better evidence around national well-being comes from immigration trends. The poor and less-educated from Latin America, particularly Mexico, had almost quit coming here by the bottom of the recession, and they will probably never resume the levels of the early 2000s. The dominant source of immigration now is Asia, and many of the Asians are wealthier and better educated than Americans (source:
The wealthier and better educated do not come here for the kind of life improvement we have been discussing. (We might want to think about what attracts them.) Clearly, those children from Central America are an anomaly in this. Most likely they are indeed fleeing violence at home.
“As far as the Christian clergy, the exclusivity is built as deeply into their religion as it is into Judaism and Islam. Indeed, I believe it is the source of most of the strife among the various factions of those religions. The supremacy is part and parcel of that. Parochialism is simply an artifact of humanity. You and I have seen the difficulty of getting people to see beyond the ends of their noses. This is aggravated because many of their clergy and officials have become aware of their lessening influence. The Gallup folks have confirmed this by long-term study conducted since the 1950s
In 1957, 82% of the people said religion “can solve all or most of today's problems.” Only 7% saw religion as outdated. By the 2010s, only 57% agreed with that statement, and 30% saw religion as “old fashioned and out of date.” Religion as a whole has lost much of its influence. That numerical advantage you mentioned still exists but has been in decline for over fifty years. Incidentally, if you refer only to Christian clergy, please say so. Keep in mind that you have a regular reader (me) who is clergy in a non-Abrahamic religion.
“I do not see the climate change issue as a product of enhanced communication. Communication increases our awareness of this, but the phenomenon itself is verified by reams of statistics gathered since the 1880s and by sound, replicated scientific studies. At some point, belief must give way to evidence.”
 . . . my response to round two:
            Re: immigration.  People have come to this country for centuries for many reasons, mostly known only to the individuals.  The process of naturalization has been established by law since 1790 [PL 1-II-003; 1 Stat. 103] – the 3rd law passed by the first constitutional Congress.  The first federal law on immigration was not enacted until 1875 [PL 43-II-141; 18 Stat. 477].  Congress did not create a “land-border patrol” until 1924 [PL 68-I-153; 43 Stat. 205, 240], more to support Prohibition than immigration control, but it was the beginning of border control for immigration.  Transportation alone to reach this country was well beyond the means of most folks until the advent of affordable air travel and other mass transportation forms.  I am a little suspicious of Casselman’s facts and presentation, but let us set those suspicions aside.  For the sake of discussion, we shall assume his essay is precisely correct.  To the point, I do not agree with the implications of his conclusion.  At least since the Immigration Act of 1924 (AKA Johnson–Reed Act) [PL 68-139; 43 Stat. 153], the United States has had laws to regulate immigration and naturalization.  The issue is not nationality, skin pigmentation, racial features, religion, well none of the social factors.  It is regulation of access and entry to this Grand Republic.  Those who cross our borders by any means, for any reason, must follow the rules to legally enter this country.  Bottom line: the Central American children did not apply for refugee status; they crossed the border illegally.
            Re: religion.  Agreed!  Parochialism and exclusivity have been built into the revealed religions, which in turn has been the root cause of considerable destruction, death and mayhem throughout recorded history.  The numbers and trends cited in your link seem reasonable to me.  Christian clergy on the whole have tempered their parochialism of late, although certainly not expunged it from their rhetoric and homilies.  Dampening pressure on Christianity has been presented since the beginning of the Renaissance.  My references to clergy in the context of this particular topic is predominately focused on Islamic clergy, although not exclusively, since they have had 600 years less dampening than Christians or Jews.  We still see significant parochialism even within Judaism, despite the fact they have had far longer to temper their exclusivity.  So, let us say in this context, my comments to clergy are aimed solely at clergy of the revealed religions, i.e., Abrahamic religions.
            Re: climate change.  As we have discussed, we continued to debate the accuracy and significance of climate change.  My comment was simply to point to the reality that we know more about climate (weather) today than ever before.  Tornados have occurred longer than humans have walked the earth.  Today, we know instantly when and where they occur, and have near instant, vivid images of the destruction they wrought; the same with hurricanes (of any name), earthquakes, forest fires, or any other natural calamity.  Weather varies every single moment of every single day . . . has been and will continue to do so.  Let us be careful not to ascribe too much significance to local, transitory, weather phenomena.  As I have said before, weather will continue to cycle, short term and long term. 
Round three:
“The only thing here I want to dispute is this one sentence with respect to immigration. The issue is not nationality, skin pigmentation, racial features, religion, well none of the social factors. How do you support that statement? I see those as major, if undisclosed, policy factors.”
 . . . my response to round three:
            Re: social factors.  I think you may be confusing the conduct of flawed human beings with the ideals at the root of this Grand Republic.  Our history is replete with examples of prejudice, persecution, discrimination, segregation and other malicious conduct despite the ideals espoused by the Founders and Framers.  Yet, that does not alter the ideals that remain our objective interaction with our fellow citizens.  That is how I support my statement.
Round four:
“Exactly. This particular discussion began when you stated the ideal as if it were the reality.”
 . . . my response to round four:
            My oh my, we are splitting hairs today.  What matters are actions!  I will argue the actions deserve the perspective of the ideals held by the individuals whose actions we seek to understand.
Round five:
“I didn't realize we were discussing ideals. I concern myself with actual results. Ideals, to me, are strictly a way to choose a direction for policy and action. If the action does not carry us in the direction of the ideals, we must change the action. I'm still waiting on that to happen in immigration policy and law.”
 . . . my response to round five:
            Re: ideals.  Agreed.  Ideals give us the foundation and objective for us on our journey through the life we have.  The problem with actions is performance of flawed human beings, in many cases who are incapable or unwilling to seek the ideals.  All of recorded history offers a boundless plethora of examples of actions of those flawed human beings willing to oppress and subjugate other human beings for their self-aggrandizement, e.g., royal prerogative so common prior to the founding of this Grand Republic.  Even in our comparatively brief history we have had the slave trade, the subjugation of Chinese immigrants, Prohibition, coverture, and the confinement of American citizens solely because of their heritage (racial ancestry), et al ad infinitum ad nauseum.  None of those things are consistent with the ideals of this Grand Republic.  Yet, through all of our sordid history, the ideals have remained our guiding light on our journey.

A different contribution:
Ja, die Mannschaft hat ausgeseichnet gespeilen!!  Excellent playing.  The German defense was excellent as well, esp against Brazil.  I think Messi was playing injured, he didn’t seem that sharp during the knockout round.”  
My reply:
            Jawohl, mein oberst!  Messi injured, perhaps; he sure quickly got up a head of steam when he needed to, so he couldn’t have been injured that badly.  This World Cup did not serve his reputation well. 

Another contribution:
“I commented earlier that we live in ‘dangerous times’. I rather wish I hadn’t said that as since then we have seen the escalation of the conflict in Gaza to which I can see little hope for conclusion unless the Israelis and the world are happy for Israel to ‘rule’ Gaza  as a governing power. We need, as always, too look at these situations from both viewpoints, however, if I was living in the land adjacent to Gaza I would get sore if a daily barrage of homemade rocketry persistently came into my backyard and would therefore very much wish to respond in kind.
“What of the Gaza view? Israel has its enemies, the Arabic states of the middle east are full of members who wish to see Israel deleted.  With their functionaries gathered on the border unwilling to listen to the democratic principle then conflict is inevitable I fear. But why? Why cannot the masters of this world come together and force a long lasting solution to this endlessly recurring situation?
“And now we hear of the shooting down of a Malaysian  Airliner with all involved shrugging shoulders. denying responsibility. We would have gone to war over such and incident not many years ago. How can this be resolved with the lies and counter lies we witness coming from The Kremlin.
“Let’s, as a world, sort these problems out. You know when the Romans ruled, when the British Empire dominated, such disturbances would have been crushed and forgotten. Is that the only way that we humans can live in harmony with one another and our beautiful planet.”
My response:
            Re: dangerous times.  Indeed!  Prophetic, it seems to me.  Hamas was looking for an excuse to start shooting.  Situation in Gaza has never been good.  With Hamas elected by the people of Gaza, it simply compounds the problems.  I have often thought they patterned their structure on the IRA, i.e., political & military wings intermixed, hard to separate.  News just reported this morning, Hamas used a donkey for a suicide bombing; somehow that seems even more inhumane than using children – the donkey has no sense of right or wrong.  I share your frustration.  I do not envy the Israeli position.  I still believe Hamas is simply an unfortunate surrogate for the Islamic Republic of Iran.  BTW, their rockets are predominately supplied by the IRI and those are military grade weapons. 
            Re: Israel.  Most of the Arab states have reconciled with Israel.  They may not like it, but they have accepted Israel as a regional state.  Heck, even the majority of Palestinians have accepted Israel.  It is groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, who are more driven by power than helping their people, that need to keep hostilities stirred up.  I look on the Palestinian situation quite akin to addiction – obsessive, compulsive, consumptive behavior.  Like addiction, there is nothing anyone can do for the Palestinians (like addicts) until they decide for themselves they must change their behavior.  I want the Palestinian people to have their own sovereign state and live in peace with their neighbors, so that everyone can prosper.  Yet, I am resigned to the reality that things will not change until the Palestinian people reject the violence of Hamas & Hezbollah, accept Israel as their neighbor, and seek to live in peace.  Like the addict, they are still seduced by the siren’s song of Hamas.
            Re: MH17.  There is no doubt in my little pea-brain that Russians pulled the trigger on that Buk SAM.  The Buk Mk 1 & subsequent SAM systems are NOT simple rifles where they put a round in the chamber, cock the hammer and pull the trigger.  It is a sophisticated missile system.  Russia has been the root instigator of the situation in Crimea & Eastern Ukraine since the get-go, and they are in it up to their eyeballs.  Russians have been and remain experts at false flag and subversive activities; they are also experts at subterfuge. 
            Re: Pax Romana & Pax Britannia.  Spot on!  We just don’t have the stomach to be the world’s policeman.  The inverse of enforced peace will inevitably be acquiescence to those who seek power by stirring up local ethnic parochialism.  If we head down that path, can we handle a thousand, a million little local nations?  Like Rodney King so eloquently said, “Ca . . . ca . . . can’t we all just get along?”
Round two with a shift:
“Lots of press about assisted dying here at the moment with a member of the Lords attempting to submit a private members bill. I know it’s a subject that you expressed eloquently when your mother was ill. Oddly, I think, but am obviously wrong, most of the resistant feelings to this is coming from those disabled, not at all what I would have expected.”
 . . . my response to round two:
            Re: assisted dying.  Yes, I remain an unwavering, out-spoken advocate, and will do so for anyone willing to listen.  I’m not sure of the significance of a “private members bill”?  Do you recall who the sponsoring member of Lords is, so I can keep an eye out as well?  Yes, the experience with my Mom’s passing made me a committed believer.  Resistance to Death with Dignity laws (DwD) is largely out of emotion and ignorance.  The disabled may fear DwD due to their perception of abuse, e.g., Nazi Heredity Law [14.7.1933].  The established laws I have studied (Oregon & Washington states) have significant safeguards, not least of which is ONLY the individual can activate or execute DwD procedures; the law specifically prohibits any delegation or collateral authorization.  We have a long common history, born largely in our Judeo-Christian faith, of prohibition of suicide, and rightly so for a host of reasons.  However, DwD should be excluded from those existing prohibition laws in the name of compassion and sympathy for the day that will come to all of us eventually.  A long, slow, lingering death is not an attractive path and it is not God’s will; no one deserves that punishment in their end of days.  DwD is absolutely, solely, and completely a personal, private, individual choice, and must never be expanded beyond that point.  Thus, if one’s religious beliefs reject such options, then no one could “force” activation; but, it is wrong to deny DwD to those who might wish to use such a procedure because we are offended by the notion.  Please keep me posted as you are able.
  I hope you feel better soon.  Have as good a weekend as you are able.  Take care and enjoy.
Cheers,
Cap
Round three:
Subject:  RE: Butt Report
From:  "Peter Gipson"
Date:  Sat, July 19, 2014 11:10 am
To:  cap@parlier.com
“Lord Falconer. Non ministerial. That’s the rules.”
 . . . my response to round three:
Thx mate.  I’ve downloaded Lord Falconer’s Bill to my Death with Dignity folder.  I hope it progresses steadily through the parliamentary process.  I’ll keep an eye on it.  As is so often the case, the Motherland is leading those of us in the colonies. 

My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)