Update from the
Heartland
No.824
9.10.17 – 15.10.17
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To
all,
The follow-up news items:
-- After the Catalonia secession referendum vote in Spain [822], Catalan President Carles
Puigdemont told the regional parliament that support for independence had
earned Catalonia the right to become a separate state, although he stepped back
from a declaration of independence from Spain. The initiative evolving in Catalonia is equivalent to Texas
seceding from this Grand Republic.
It is also quite akin to not liking an umpire’s call and taking your
ball and bat home. I do not see
this effort as positive for Spain or Catalonia, but hey that’s just me and I do
not matter a hoot.
-- The fellow in the Oval Office signed another executive
order (seems to be a very popular instrument for him, despite his vociferous
condemnation of his predecessor for exactly the same thing—hypocrisy perhaps) ending
federal subsidy funds to insurers under the PPACA [432 et al]. The
subsidy funds partially covered health insurance for low-income citizens. Will this action reduce federal
expenditures? Yes. Will it reduce premiums for middle-class
citizens? Not likely, but
possible. Heck, the President’s
callous reaction will not affect my health insurance one little twit, so why
should we care? . . . because we
should have compassion for our fellow citizens regardless of their success in
life. IMHO, the uncertainty in the
health care insurance market place will increase premiums for most folks not in
government programs (like me) due to the serious lack of stability, consistency
and predictability of their risks.
The President’s action was wrong and quite indicative of the dysfunction
in our government. I am afraid the
health care situation is going to get dreadfully worse, before we have any hope
of improvement.
-- President Trump refused to certify that Iran is complying
with the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (AKA Iran deal or Iran nuclear
deal) [623, 624, 694, 709, 717] despite the fact that everyone short of the President has
publicly stated that the IRI has been and remains in technical compliance with
the agreement. The President’s
action pushes the agreement back to Congress for action. It is difficult to see or understand
what exactly the President is trying to do; however, it appears it is just one
more anti-anything-Obama convulsive action. According to a public statement by Secretary of State Rex
Tillerson, the USG has two key areas of disagreement with the current plan: 1.)
the IRI's ballistic missile program, and 2.) “sunset clauses” in the original plan
that allow restrictions to expire at various times. Like so many of “his” actions, this is a petulant and
inappropriate unilateral response to a multi-national international agreement
that is quite likely to be equivalent to cutting off his nose to spite his
face. This is also a roll of the
dice by POTUS; he could just as easily lose as win—helluva gamble. One of the myriad problems with his
petulant gamble is, when he loses, most likely American citizens and other
innocent people will die. We shall
see how his gamble plays out.
The
list of male sexual predators using their positions and power to impose upon
females from sexual assault to outright rape continues to grow. Cinema producer Harvey Weinstein is
simply the latest publicly-out’ed version. The list is long and I am certain it is not all-inclusive
and will continue to grow—Roman Polanski, Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Dominique
Strauss-Kahn, Roger Ailes, Donald Trump, Bill O’Reilly, Jerry Sandusky, Dennis
Hastert, et al. These men were or are
obsessed with their power and do not respect women (or in the case of the last
two cited examples, young boys). I
could open up the list to include female and male children to encompass
Catholic priests around the world and other clergy, but my listing above should
be sufficient for this topic. It
is a modern day version of the divine right of kings, i.e., the king can do no
wrong; and therefore, they feel entitled to impose their selfish, egocentric,
misogynistic actions on females not likely to resist their authority. One of these days, one of these
predators will go to jail and serve their penance for their abuse of power and
egregious transgressions. Their
conduct is all about disrespecting the rights and autonomy of another human
being. They feel they are better,
more entitled to do as they wish, without regard to anyone else. The bottom line remains, if they had
respect for other people, they would not do what they do. Sadly, the only ones to serve any
punishment for their crimes were Sandusky and Hastert. The rest of them should be punished for
their transgressions. Avoiding
such charges and condemnation is easy and simple: respect all people as equals,
regardless of wealth, position, or the social factors. Full stop!
Comments and contributions from Update no.823:
Comment to the Blog:
“You have given what I believe is the clearest and most
coherent suggestion of what firearms should be regulated that I can ever recall
seeing. I'm in complete agreement
with that idea.
“However, I believe we can and should regulate the number of
firearms a given person owns. Above
a certain number (somewhere between 5 and 10), we need to further regulate the
owner as a ‘collector’ or ‘museum’ and make those regulations stringent enough
so that the rest of us are relatively safe. Australia, historically a nation of rugged individualists,
has achieved quite a bit more than that based on a single horrific incident. We can, too, if those who finance
politicians to prevent it can be set aside.”
My response to the
Blog:
Thank
you very much. It is gratifying to
know that I can get it correct on occasion.
Re:
“I believe we can and should regulate the number of firearms a given person owns.” I’m not so sure about that one. I would really need to see the words
and more importantly the means of enforcement before I could support such a
restriction. There are more than a
few nations that seriously restrict or prohibit firearm ownership. I am just not sure how such restrictions
might be implemented and enforced.
Another contribution:
“I hope your contributor continues to do so.
“We have had Hillary Clinton on our television this evening-most
enlightening. She was asked if she
thought the current person in the job was suitable-you can guess the answer. She was also wished, in Welsh, for
better results in 2020! I was
quite impressed by her caring and thoughtful attitude.
"Things are getting busy here with remembrance looming- school
visits, unrehearsed of course with questions. This year I’m going to hit them
with some science on what makes an aircraft fly. Mr. Newton may well come into it when I demonstrate the 3rd
law. It’s never easy to talk about
war and death to youngsters, especially the very young. Fortunately one session will be with
the 6th formers, I can and will lay it on for them. One problem is the loss of our WW2
veterans and war veterans in general. We’ve lost our Malian war veteran this year. My God, he went through it. He was also one of the guards at Spandau
guarding Rudolf Hess. What an
incredible career-he also became a guard at Buckingham Palace. Why I didn’t take him to one side and
write down his story I’ll never know. Cap, we must record this era.
“Of course the Poppy Appeal kicks off too-so there’s plenty to do
but that’s what we’re here for.
“We will remember them at two local church services and when the
youngsters lay crosses that they have named at the war memorials. That is moving.”
My reply:
I
hope s/he continues to contribute as well. So far so good.
I
doubt Hillary will run again in 2020; but, we never know . . . still three
years away. She barely got through
the last one. She is a polished
and an accomplished politician . . . unlike the current occupant of the Oval
Office.
Yes,
indeed, it is that time of year.
Remembrance Day only a few weeks away. Wow, a guard at Spandau . . . and of Hess . . . I’ll bet he
had some interesting stories to tell.
I’m trying to do my part at least for WW2, Korea & Vietnam . . . a
labor of love, respect and tribute.
Good
luck with your annual Poppy Appeal.
May God bless their immortal souls.
My
very best wishes to all. Take care
of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
On a quick scan, Catalonia’s relationship to Spain looks more like California’s to the United States than Texas’s. (I admit that my opinion is based partly on negative personal experience of Texas.) Were Texas to secede, my only concern would be border security. If California seceded, I’d want to be on the California side of the border. In any secession, legal disputes will be complex and arcane.
T-rump’s latest executive commandment will eventually affect all US health care. Effectively taking health care away from millions of people will reduce employment in health care and other resources available to health care providers. Those Americans whose health care survives will lose services due to the health care industry’s loss of income. Premiums and co-pays will probably rise in an attempt by insurers to recoup lost income. If this executive order stands, the ripples will affect all Americans. Medicare will be affected one way or another, and Medicare is already too expensive for me without help from Medicaid and a third-party “Medigap” policy.
Agent Orange also seems to be seeking a war with Iran, perhaps because the North Koreans have not yet satisfied his desire for combat. However, other parties in the Iran treaty he has attacked are EU nations run by grownups. I hope they can prevent major consequences from this particular tantrum.
Your list of sexual predators in positions of power could probably be expanded as far back and as broadly as we can find information. Some of those abusers would be women (think Catherine the Great), and some of the victims were and are men. Society worldwide has an unsolved problem around how to grant authority on many levels in order to have an orderly and productive society without also giving license to abuse. Increasingly strong and prompt responses to specific abuses are probably helping, but I suspect an even deeper issue underlies the willful abuse of the weak. I struggle to even come up with a way to describe what I mean. Evidence-based reasoning versus easy belief, principles versus personalities, and individual versus societal focus all play into it. When I come up with something coherent enough to put into an essay, I’ll discuss it with you.
PS: The church that ordained me tells me October is National Clergy Appreciation Month. Let me to be the first clergy person today to encourage you to appreciate clergy if/when we deserve it, but don’t let your guard down.
Calvin,
Re: “Catalonia’s relationship to Spain looks more like California’s to the United States than Texas’s.” We could argue the point on various levels; however, I will accept your quick scan. Regardless, secession is serious business and should never be taken “for light and transient causes.”
Re: health care. Well, actually, whether Trump’s executive order stands or not, the damage has been done just by inference. Insurance is at its most fundamental the monetization of risk. His unilateral action has substantially increased the risk. The Republicans have torpedoed the PPACA simply by their relentless quest to repeal. They have shown no interest in the health care system . . . only anti-anything-Obama. The longer this foolishness persists the more I lean toward universal health care like Europe, Canada and other civilized countries.
Re: Agent Orange. Good one!
Re: the man who occupies the Oval Office. He likes to puff himself up and act tough-guy . . . with other people’s blood. At least Hitler saw combat and was seriously wounded. Yes, he seems to have forgotten and perhaps never knew the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) was actually a joint agreement between the P5+1 Group, or more precisely the EU/EU3 + 3, and the IRI. It was NOT an agreement between the U.S. and the IRI.
Re: sexual predators. Quite so; I said as much. After I posted my short list, I realized I should have added Clarence Thomas to that infamous list. Yes, agreed, there are female sexual predators; I just contend they are far fewer in number than males. You may feel you are struggling to describe your thought, but I thought you did quite well. Throughout all of recorded history (all 6,000 years of it), men (and a few women) have succumbed to the powerful narcotic of megalomania—dominating other human beings. When you add in the very corrosive consequences of narcissism, the combination becomes dangerous to humanity. I look forward to your insight.
I send my heartfelt appreciation for your spiritual contributions.
Have a great day. Take care and enjoy.
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment