31 August 2015

Update no.715

Update from the Heartland
No.715
24.8.15 – 30.8.15
To all,

           This was not a good week . . . into every life a little darkness comes.

            On Thursday, Channing Samuel Morse [USAFA 1970], 67, died doing one of the things he truly enjoyed in life – flying.  Details of the incident are rather scarce at the moment.  Chan was flying a single-engine, single place, Piper PA-25 Pawnee tow plane in support of the Wounded Warrior Project, offering glider flights to disabled veterans.  He had completed a glider release and was on approach to Crystal Airport, Llano, California.  The NTSB is investigating the accident.  Chan served a tour in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War as a combat search and rescue pilot flying Sikorsky HH-53B/C “Jolly Green Giant” helicopters – quite a few stories in that service alone.  Chan and I were in the same section of Class 73 at the U.S. Navy Test Pilot School, NAS Patuxent River, Maryland, and we remained friends and colleagues since completing our education and training.  As fate would have it, Chan and I came back together as experimental test pilots with Hughes Helicopters (McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, and later Boeing).  We worked together on a revolutionary, digital, fly-by-wire, flight control system in support of the Army’s LHX program.  Chan went to a long list of major aircraft development and certification programs including various forms of the NOTAR (NO TAil Rotor) system.  When he reached mandatory retirement age, he left Boeing and started his consulting and pilot services company.  Chan was a highly accomplished and skilled pilot.  He was the 1988 recipient of the Experimental Test Pilot Society’s Iven C. Kincheloe Award for his NOTAR work.  May God rest your immortal soul, Chan.  You will be sorely missed.

            On Tuesday, Lieutenant General Frank Emmanuel Petersen Jr., USMC (Ret.), 83, passed away.  I knew Frank by reputation, as a fellow but more senior Marine aviator.  I met him, shook his hand and got to know him when I joined the Board of Directors, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) in 1991.  I knew him as a generous, amicable, humorous man of considerable wisdom, compassion, insight and presence.  Frank made history as the first American citizen with dark skin pigmentation to become a Marine aviator and later a Marine general.  He served this Grand Republic through four decades including the tumultuous 60’s and 70’s.  The honor of serving the NMDP mission became all the more exciting and enjoyable with his friendship and contributions.  I strongly encourage everyone to read and learn his story in Frank’s autobiography, “Into the Tiger’s Jaw,” published by Presidio Press, 1998.  Rest well, my friend . . . you have earned it.

            News from the economic front:
-- The People's Bank of China (PBC) cut interest rates by another quarter point and reduced bank-reserve requirements by half a point amid market turmoil.  The Chinese government continues to struggle with their slowing economy and volatile market reactions.  The rest of us hang-on and watch.

            Comments and contributions from Update no.714:
“Thanks for your update. Looks like we might have our comms sorted! I’m testing on yourself, my colonial friend. Your update is the shortest ever and I have missed the opportunity to put some of my views for what, some months. Ah well let’s see. It’s getting passed bedtime here you’ll be amused perhaps to hear that my lap top programme(s) was sorted by a lad in India working for our British Telecom…working on the telephone and taking command of the lap top.
“Nasty flying accident here at Shoreham on the south coast where a Hawker Hunter plummeted onto a busy main road during a display. It was a twin seat Mk7, the pilot survived critically injured but currently 12 killed in their cars.  The aircraft appeared to loop over the show and then flattened out instead of climbing away and fell into some trees and the road. I never flew in one but worked on them on 65 Squadron a Battle of Britain Squadron. A good aircraft.”
My reply:
            Amazing how all this technology works, huh.  So glad, you got things sorted out.  Glad to have you back in battery.
            Yeah, the Shoreham accident has been big in the news in the colonies since it happened.  He is not the first pilot to get caught in such a maneuver.  Rather infamous Thunderbirds solo F-16 accident a few years back . . . virtually a duplicate.  I hope the investigators get to talk to the pilot.
            The Hunter was a good aircraft.  I never flew it either.  The Swiss had several squadrons and may still be operating them.

Another contribution:
“I have just finished an unsuccessful five-month run for Justice Court (part time small claims and misdemeanors judge), motivated almost solely by the revulsion I felt when a few days before the qualifying deadline I had a chance encounter with the incumbent.  I had known him as a mean and arrogant attorney and for the past fifteen years had heard of his open disdain for some defendants in the courtroom.  His words that February day had some reference to his verbal admonitions to defendants who used as an excuse for their debts a delay in receiving their ‘check’ to pay their bills, voicing a general attitude that I admit sometimes feeling about worthless welfare recipients who should be working but one that I would never allow to enter into my dialogue on or off the bench as a general pattern of treatment for an assumed set of facts.  It sparked a recollection of the day sixteen years ago when he arrived unannounced at my law office to assure me that I need not run, as urged by some supporters, for the position of the dying incumbent because he was going to get the job and had some prodigious amount of money already committed to the campaign.  It was classic behavior for him.  He ran.  I did not.  He got the job.  I could not stand the thought of another four years for him without at least offering a choice for the electorate. 
“It was interesting.  His financial report showed that he received and spent more than three times what I spent of my own funds, I having announced at the outset that in the interests of an independent judiciary I would not accept any contributions.  His reported contributors included large gifts from the four-decade Godfather of [anon.] County politics and several count seat attorneys who were among those sorely disappointed by my election to replace their favorite state court trial judge twenty-five years ago and are still smarting from the reforms I put in place in that court.  The incumbent's hundreds of yard signs and larger duplicate roadside signs were all illegal, lacking any of the required subscription of approval by any committee or the candidate or any identification of who paid for them, while many of my modest yard signs disappeared from the yards of my supporters in his home town.  And with a well-organized and financed campaign, he received more than three times as many votes as I got!  
“Oh well, sometimes those ‘egocentric, narcissistic, flamboyant, arrogant people’ you refer to prevail in our system, but it was worth it to give the judge a run for his money.  I think your friend, my brother Bob would have been proud of me for trying, if not for being so [family]-like stubborn about perceived principle.
“My loyal brother-in-law called and lovingly congratulated me for losing and returning to my hard earned retirement....”
My response:
            I did not intend to strike a nerve; for that, I offer my most humble apologies.
            Further, I shall add my voice to your brother-in-law’s words and congratulate you for an honorable campaign . . . regardless of the outcome.
            Yes, I acknowledge the assholes often win.  As a side note, I hung up my spurs as an experimental test pilot in 1988, to go into management for one primary reason: to prove you did not have to be an asshole to success in business.  I failed.  Only assholes are successful.  I am content with my accomplishments, nonetheless. 
            Your brother was indeed very proud of you.  He told me in many ways.
 . . . follow-up comment:
“How nice of you to respond!
“I didn't mean to suggest that you had struck any nerve, so no need to apologize.”

A different contribution:
“In regards to humility, Golda Meir, the former Israeli Prime Minister used to say, ‘Don't be so humble, you're not that great.’  I think she said that to nobody in particular.”
My reply:
            Oh my, I certainly recognize my paucity of greatness, however, I have always found comfort in humility.  Further, I have always found humility a far more admirable trait than arrogance, or worse bombastic arrogance.  I have always believed in the old adage, let your actions speak for you.
 . . . follow-up comment:
“I did not mean to direct my reply to you personally.  I thought that, like me, you and some of your readers would find this somewhat amusing.  I agree with the adage you quoted.  Here is one that came to my mind, from Proverbs 27:2.  ‘Let another praise you and not your own mouth.’”
 . . . my follow-up reply:
            Thank you for your concern and explanation.  I did not find any offense or take it personally.
            I had not heard the Meir quote before, so thank you for that as well.  This exchange will be in this week’s Update for the benefit of the readers.
            Proverbs offered the same wisdom in the words of the Good Book.

The last contribution this week:
“Email kerfuffle, huh?  I like your choice of words.  I am baffled as well, but certainly more than somewhat.  I am extremely baffled.  Aside from one thinking they are above the law, I really don’t understand how this could happen.  Certainly many of those in the State Department must have known something was not right.  When dealing with classified material, as you and I have both done over the years, we know fully the consequences of mishandling classified material.  But still, I am puzzled as to how someone in the State Department could think that the volumes of sensitive information they deal with, sending and receiving, would not be classified.  But I think I may be getting off track.  There was protocol in place for there not to exist personal email accounts with which to conduct State Department business, and forms to sign acknowledging such.  I know what happens when I do not sign the acknowledgment form—I lose my job.  And why is there such difficulty in recovering the lost emails?  It is ludicrous to think the Hillary server was not backed up by Platte River.  You or I would be sitting in jail right now had we conducted ourselves in the manner in which some people at the State Department have done.  Please believe me when I say it is painfully difficult to ask without expletives what the heck is going on with our State Department?  Where is the leadership for an organization that must espouse integrity at the highest level?  Blood pressure rising.  Better call it quits for now.”
My response:
            Good observation.  Having spent some time on the dark side, our working papers, notes and such – precursors of actual published documents – were always considered classified at the highest of the source material involved, until the product document could be evaluated, and properly and appropriately classified.  That was back in the days of pencils and typewriters, before electronic media.  I can’t imagine the rules are appreciably different today.
            We do not have the details of specific, applicable conversations back when SecState Clinton decided she was not going to abide State Dept. or USG policy, but likewise, I cannot imagine some conversation between Hillary and security folks when she decided to conduct her business on a separate, private server, not under the control of USG IT security professionals.
            As SecState, her thoughts by themselves could easily be considered highly classified regardless of any labeling.  Further, there is no way to label on-going communications, thus they should be considered classified until determined otherwise.  The SecState IS A SOURCE, not an analysis product, and had to be a highly classified source.
            Bottom line: her decision to mix personal and private electronic media on her private server was wrong, full stop!  Whomever enabled her in doing so was also wrong.  To me, it was the arrogance of privilege, quite akin to the royal prerogative – I am not a fan.

            My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)

24 August 2015

Update no.714

Update from the Heartland
No.714
17.8.15 – 23.8.15
To all,

            This week’s Update is rather thin.  I presume everyone has other things to do.  After all, it is the holiday month.

            To be frank, I am somewhat baffled by this eMail kerfuffle.  The secretary of state, as a senior cabinet officer in the Executive Branch, generates / creates classified material by words alone.  Of course original electronic communications were not / could not be classified before hand.  Whether the words are labeled as classified does not alter the sensitive nature of such words.  Further, when a government employee (or any employee) decides to mix work and private communications, s/he has voided a right to privacy in personal communications.  There is NO royal prerogative in this Grand Republic, no matter who you are or what your family name happens to be.  You defy the rules you accept the consequences.  ‘Nuf said.

            I tend to value humility.  As such, it cannot be a surprise that I do NOT appreciate egocentric, narcissistic, flamboyant, arrogant people, regardless of how much money they like to tell us they are worth.  It reminds me of the O’Club Happy Hour axiom from my aviator days – it is always the quiet ones you have to watch.  They do not need to tell everyone how good they are; their actions speak for them.

            No comments or contributions from Update no.713.

            My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)

17 August 2015

Update no.713

Update from the Heartland
No.713
10.8.15 – 16.8.15
To all,

            The follow-up news items:
-- Eurozone finance ministers approved an €86B (US$96B) bailout for Greece [704, 707, 709].  The lifeline for Greece keeps the country in the Eurozone, and requires financial, economic and societal reforms to reduce the nation’s massive debt to at least a more manageable level.

            ‘Tis the season, it seems . . . at least according to the calendar and the “On This Date” reminiscences in various source materials and sites.  One of the great, perpetual, public policy debates has been and will remain President Truman’s decision to employ the newly proven technology of a nuclear fission weapon.  Offering adequate context for the President’s decision is difficult to properly present in a large, non-fiction book, so clearly impossible in a puny weekly Blog.  I offer three related opinions for your discerning review.
-- “Debating the Morality of Hiroshima”
Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (StratFor)
Published: AUGUST 11, 2015 | 08:00 GMT
-- “The Real Reason America Dropped The Atomic Bomb. It Was Not To End The War”
collective-evolution.com
Published: May 9, 2015
-- “The Bureaucrats Who Singled Out Hiroshima for Destruction – How committee meetings, memos, and largely arbitrary decisions ushered in the nuclear age
by Paul Ham
The Atlantic
Published: AUG 6, 2015
Let us try to place this controversial decision into a broader context.  Germany had just surrendered unconditionally, and the Manhattan Project team carried out a pre-cursor, calibration test, detonating a 0.1 KT cube-pile of Composition B conventional explosive material [7.May.1945].  After ascending to the presidency on the sudden passing of Franklin Roosevelt just two months earlier [12.April.1945], President Truman reviewed and approved the plans for Operation DOWNFALL [18.June.1945] – the invasion of mainland Japan – and involved two major phases: Operation OLYMPIC – the invasion of Kyushu [preliminary D-Day: 1.November.1945] – and Operation CORONET – the invasion of Honshu, near Tokyo and the Kanto Plain [preliminary D-Day: 1.March.1946].  The casualty estimates included one million Allied (mostly U.S.) killed and wounded and two million Japanese men, women and children.  While Truman reviewed and approved the plans for DOWNFALL, Operation ICEBERG – the Battle of Okinawa – was still grinding on, having begun on 26.March.1945, against a fanatical, suicidal enemy that resulted in 12,500 U.S. killed plus 55,000 wounded (with 77,000 Japanese soldiers killed and an estimated 150,000 civilians killed).  The prospect of even more horrific casualties to subdue Japan cast a rather dark cloud over pending operations under DOWNFALL.  After all, 16 square miles of Tokyo had been destroyed in a single, massive raid by the B-29’s of the 20th Air Force [10.March.1945], and still, the Japanese government did not budge.  The Allied TERMINAL conference opened in Potsdam, Germany, on Sunday, 15.July.1945, while on the following day, the Manhattan Project team detonated the 20KT Trinity fission device in Alamogordo, New Mexico, to prove the science and engineering of the potential weapon.  The Allies issued the Potsdam Proclamation [26.July.1945] that demanded the unconditional surrender of Japan and concluded, “The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction.”  We can argue whether that warning was clear enough given the enormity of change in warfare that the fission device represented.  The Japanese government responded with silence.  Two days later, Japanese newspapers reported the government had rejected the Allied demands (and ignored the warning).  The order to execute the nuclear attack was issued on 2.August.1945.  Even after the first attack, the Japanese government still rejected demands for their unconditional surrender.  Three days later, the second attack occurred.  It took another five days, the Emperor’s rare, personal intervention, and a nearly successful but failed coup d’état for the Japanese to finally submit to Allied demands.  Given the context, President Truman did what had to be done to end the war and save lives.  History has proven and validated President Truman’s courageous decision.  To me, the decision and action were clearly justified.  To this day, I would argue for employment of nuclear weapons should similar situations be presented.  Further, as long as potential adversaries maintain nuclear weapons, the United States must retain its deterrent capability.  So it is, so it shall be.

            This week’s Supreme Court review focuses on King v. Burwell [576 U.S. ___ (2015); no. 14-114] – the latest and hopefully the last judicial pronouncement on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [PL 111-148; 124 Stat. 119; 23.March.2010] [432].  This 6-3 ruling was not a high point of judicial proclamations, either.              As I understand this case, the entire decision hangs upon one article in one sentence that appears a half dozen times throughout the PPACA law – “an Exchange established by the State under [42 U SC §18031].”  [emphasis added].  The majority rejected the challenge to the law.
            I will chalk up this lackluster decision to a rather silly wordsmithing debate – the specific article ‘the’ versus the general, non-specific article ‘a.’ and upper case State versus lower case state.  The specific article ‘the’ in combination with the capitalized ‘State’ cannot mean a single state or even group of states as a subset of the generalized, broad reference to government, i.e., ‘the State.’  In contrast, use of ‘a state’ would clearly mean any number of compliant states.  If PPACA was meant to apply only to states that created health insurance exchanges and not to those citizens in states that refused to create exchanges and thus had to resort to the Federal exchange, the law would have little practical meaning or value.  To defeat the tax credit application would be to emasculate PPACA, which hardly seems to be the intent of Congress.  I have already spent more time on this case than it deserves.  ‘Nuf said!

            News from the economic front:
-- The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the People's Bank of China (PBC) devalued their tightly controlled currency, as the world's second-largest economy continues to sputter.  While the PBC actions are apparently moves toward a market-base, floating currency, international market had not expected the move and reacted negatively, at least in the short term.

            Comments and contributions from Update no.712:
“What other 777s have gone missing or have lost a flaperon that the flaperon in question could be attributed to?   If the answer is none, then cannot a conclusion be drawn that the flaperon in question came from MH370?”
My reply:
            Indeed!  That is the popular reasoning.
            However, it must be noted that there are also spare parts, work in progress parts, et cetera.  The usual data plate bonded to the exterior rib web is missing.   Until the found-item can be absolutely and positively identified as installed on that particular B777, we must be cautious not to ascribe more significance than is justified by the physical data.  One more observation, I am surprised at how little damage there is on that part.
 . . . a follow-up comment:
“Is it possible there are nefarious covert activities at work—the planting of 777 flaperons in the ocean, in the hope of being found and attributed to MH370 and its demise—such that the real MH370 can be loaded with who knows what and flown to a demise of evil intention?
“I will grant you the following:
  • ·      Serial numbers/data plates should allow the matching of the flaperon to the specific aircraft known as MH370.
  • ·      I would expect to see more structural damage to the flaperon—enough force damage to have torn the flaperon from its wing.

“    Do you suppose intelligence gathering a la satellite imaging, etc., is continuing with trying to locate an intact MH370 on the ground somewhere in some remote location?”
      . . . my follow-up response:
John,
            Good Q’s.
            Re: “Is it possible there are nefarious covert activities at work?  Possible, but to my knowledge, there is no evidence to even remotely suggest such a scenario.  I certainly could build a hypothetical like that into a plausible event.
            Re: “serial numbers.”  The normal external data plate for a major component like a flaperon would present the necessary identifying information.  However, as I said, the data plate is missing.  There are other assembly numbers contained inside.  Some of those might be accessible via a borescope, but I suspect disassembly will be required, and the investigators will not (or should not) do any alteration until all assembled tests have been completed and exhausted.
            Re: “damage.”  Ripping a flaperon from its place on the wing would leave substantial, definitive damage, e.g., twisting, distorting, fracturing of the metal components.  I’ve not seen the underside . . . where the attachments are.  Also, the damage to the trailing edge could be from other causes, e.g., environmental.
            Re: “Do you suppose intelligence gathering a la satellite imaging, . . . ground somewhere in some remote location?  I have little doubt the IC professionals who do such work these days have been and will remain vigilant for any B777 size object that might appear in an unexpected location.

My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)

10 August 2015

Update no.712

Update from the Heartland
No.712
3.8.15 – 9.8.15
To all,

            The follow-up news items:
-- On Wednesday, Prime Minister Haji Mohammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak of Malaysia publicly proclaimed, “It is with a very heavy heart that I must tell you that an international team of experts have conclusively confirmed that the aircraft debris found on Reunion Island is indeed from MH370.” [638, 691]  Not so fast, Mister Prime Minister!
            I cannot and will not make any linkage until a competent, independent, professional, investigation organization presents the physical evidence of a direct connection to MH370, i.e., serial numbers or some other unique identifier.  I have seen none of that data to date.  So, we have only one errant B777 flaperon, period.  I urge caution to allow the methodical investigation process to play itself out by design.  The minister was inappropriately premature.
-- On Friday, a Colorado jury failed to reach a unanimous decision to impose the death penalty on the Aurora theater shooter [554/55], after his conviction for capital murder [709].  As a consequence, by default, he was sentenced life in prison without the possibility of parole.  The sentence does not seem worthy of crime – taking 12 innocent lives and wounded 70 others.  I suspect there will be no appeal.  This should be the end of him and this tragic episode . . . unless some future governor decides to pardon him.

            I was going to offer my opinion of the JV & Varsity Republican “debates,” but frankly, I am rather disgusted and disappointed with the profound distraction imbedded in their lot at the moment.  The last thing this country needs is another egocentric, narcissistic blowhard in a leadership role.

            Below, I have attempted to convey extracts from a rather lengthy, multi-faceted exchange in a parallel forum.  This was a complicated exchange that I have had to edit and hope I have done it justice for the sake of public debate.
            The exchange began with Person 1 sending this news clip / link:
“Planned Parenthood official: Abortion procedures, prices altered to meet demand”
FoxNews.com
Published August 04, 2015
 . . . to which the contributor added:
“Amazing how Satanic practices can be disguised as a WOMAN'S CHOICE.  Then, they make money on baby parts.” [Emphasis is the author’s as sent.]
I offered a one-word reply:
Really?
 . . . Round two (Person 1):
“Hello Cap, for me, and as I believe it should be for all of us regarding the murder of babies, this is very binary!  It is black/white or yes/no, with no 50 Shades of Grey, no fancy and happy rainbow flags, and no creative rational justification for what is just what I called it--MURDER.  There is no debate, no reconciling, no expensive lawyers to argue this, no Supreme Court justices to decide in their corrupted ways, Cap.  I call upon GOD to make all of U.S. more DISCERNING as to this issue that has snuffed millions of babies just in America.” [Emphasis is the author’s as sent.]
 . . . my response to round two:
            Oh, I understand quite well the binary aspect of this issue, but that neither intimidates nor dissuades me.
            Truth be told, as I have written many times, I have long believed abortion is as archaic as bloodletting to treat influenza, or amputation to treat a compound fractured limb.  I will cheer the day no one feels the need to resort to the procedure.  That said, I believe more strongly in the sanctity of the individual.  The decision to abort a pregnancy is a moral one, and thus between the pregnant individual and God.  I do not want anyone making my moral judgments, and I must respect that same right in everyone else, including a woman who finds herself with an unwanted pregnancy.
            I also acknowledge, respect and understand the argument – who defends the unwanted embryo / fetus in her womb.  Scientifically, I cannot ascribe humanity to a cell that has divided once.  Those cells growing within a woman’s uterus are no different from any other cells that grow or might grow within a woman’s body.  What happens within her body is hers to deal with, and as I said, a moral decision she must make, and thus between her consciousness, her soul and God.  We have no right to enter into or impose our moral values and choices upon her body.
            Now, I also agree with the Supreme Court.  There comes a time in the gestation cycle where a fetus can survive outside the womb, without the mother (host).  We can argue whether that threshold point is the 3rd trimester, or some other sustainment point given today’s medical ability, but it certainly cannot be the instant of conception.  I understand it makes the moral argument very clean and binary, as you say, but convenience does not make it correct.
            Lastly, I truly wish the moral outrage your opinion represents could offer even a mere fraction of that energy to the welfare of living, breathing children as it does a single, microscopic cell about to divide itself for the first time.  It is long past time to grow out of the Victorian morality that has so controlled our society.  It is time to grow up.
            “That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
 . . . Round three (Person 1):
“Hi Cap, as you know, I am opinionated on this issue.  It is a topic/procedure that has long divided America.  I agree with you that the woman who chooses abortion, will have to live with that decision both consciously and subconsciously, and may be affected by it in many subtle ways we are not even aware of.
“I got out of the air ambulance business, partly, because I no longer witnessed the desire to provide a needed service to those who needed acute medical care, but instead saw mostly only profit motivation attached to our service.  We were also flying ‘harvest teams’ for organ transplants, which meant our pilots needed to mark their Igloo coolers so they did not reach in for a soft drink, in a team's Igloo that contained parts.
“To see that Planned Parenthood (which name is such a oxymoron) may be putting baby parts on the market, where we'll be told the dead ones help make for healthy ones, is more than 1984.
“Some may believe our culture/world is making progress, when in fact I see it often as devolution.”
 . . . Person 2’s contribution to round three:
“Being a decent fellow at heart, you assume that women who kill their unborn babies even HAVE some sort of conscience.  Lots of ‘soulless’ people in this world who’d rather make cold-cuts out of dead kids than cuddle living ones. [Emphasis is the author’s as sent.]
 . . . Round four (Person 1):
“‘But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.…’
“~1 Timothy 4:2”
 . . . Person 2 response to round four:
“Ritual child sacrifice.  Our civilization has collapsed.”
 . . . Person 1 response to Person 2 in round four:
Thank you [Person 2], glad you see it for what it really is, instead of writing it off or rationalizing it as a WOMAN's CHOICE. You are one of the discerners amongst the blind.  [Emphasis is the author’s as sent.]
 . . . Person 2’s response:
“In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is hunted down without mercy for being a deadly menace to the "natural" order of things.
“You better believe it!”
 . . . to which Person 3 added:
“I don’t care how abortion is presented, in modern society it has no place.  Modern medicine is slow in providing an inexpensive way of birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancy.  But Planned Parenthood figured out a way of maximizing profits off helpless humans.  The practice is barbaric made even worse by the body parts and organs that are sold to the highest bidder.
“By and large the supporters of these gruesome procedures are support by the same political party that gave us slavery and Jim Crow…Democrats!”
 . . . Person 1 replied to Person 3:
“Thanks for your contribution.  I have felt for a long time that the practice of abortion is a mass form of Satanic rituals, that satisfies the fallen souls of our world, those in higher order brotherhoods.  How else could it be explained?   [Person 2] has referred to this as well.
“Man's problem is we put science and technology before God, humanity, kindness, morality and our hearts.   Hillary's hero, Margret Sanger, was far more into eugenics, than saving a woman's life through abortion.”
 . . . along with my response to round four:
            The series of this exchange represents the fundamental issue.  It is not abortion or personhood for a zygote.  Further, we need no further demonstrations of the intensity of emotions associated with abortion.  I respect both the polarity and intensity of opinions.  What I cannot support is the belief we have the right to intrude upon a woman’s bodily functions and her moral decisions.  Condemn the procedure . . . fine; that is our right to speak out.  Leave the woman alone with her private, moral choices.  Neither the State nor the majority have a right to intrude upon a citizen’s fundamental right to privacy.  I want my privacy respected, as each of us does, so we must protect everyone’s fundamental right to privacy.
            “That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
 . . . Person 4 added:
“Or called infantile by those who think maturity and sophistication is attained by exhibiting a laissez-faire moral doctrine.
“You can't legislate morality, but you can legislate against immorality as long as you have a yardstick to measure it by.  Once you blur the lines so you can longer evaluate the difference then you have Sodom, Gomorrah and Babylon.”
 . . . I responded to Person 1 and Person 4:
            Morality is what we do when no one is looking.  Morality is taught and learned in childhood.  Morality is between the individual and God.  Injecting the State into a citizen’s fundamental right to privacy . . . the essence of freedom itself . . . is wrong in the worst possible way, and not what the Founders intended.  The State is a blunt instrument with enormous unintended consequences, as we have multitudinous examples.  It is wrong to violate / punish / penalize a 100 innocent people to find the one true wrongdoer.  The State does not belong in our private affairs, period.  I don’t think you want the State in your private life, and I imagine [Person 4] does not want the State is his private affairs.  I can guarantee I do not want the State (nor you, nor [Person 4]) in my private life.
 . . . Round five:
“Not to dilute the core of the discussion, or distract, but isn't Obamacare very much the State in my private life as to the regulatory/enforcement aspects for those without signing-up, and as to the loss of patient confidentiality or at least risk of, by health providers sharing data with BIG GOV?  [Emphasis is the author’s as sent.]
“‘If you like your plan and you like your doctor, you won't have to do a thing. You keep your plan. You keep your doctor.’ ~ Obama's statement some 37 times prior to the ACA being passed.  Thanks Obama for letting me keep my own plan/doctor.”
 . . . my response to round five:
            Excellent segue, I must say . . . a smooth, effortless transition.  As such, I changed the subject line to PPACA . . . since I refuse to use the term you offered.
            I do not see the intrusion you imply.  PPACA, with all its complexity, is about every citizen having health insurance.  All forms of insurance – life, house, automobile, whatnot – are about paying a reasonable amount for all the time you don’t need it, for the few times or when you do need it – cost leveling, if you will.  PPACA is no different from state laws requiring every automobile owner to have a minimal level of insurance.  You know quite well aircraft insurance providers are far more “involved” in who can fly an aircraft than PPACA is in who you choose as your health insurance provider and your family physician / general practitioner.  I have written many times over many years that I would be OK with an opt-out provision as long as an individual has some permanent notice attached to their person that the individual is not covered and must pay cash up front for treatment, including emergency services.  We were all paying for the uninsured by exorbitant overhead charges for uncollectible medical services.  So, let’s call it what it is and not try to make it something it is not.

            News from the economic front:
-- The U.S. Labor Department reported nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 215,000 in July.  They also revised the May and June estimated employment numbers upward by 14,000 more jobs. The unemployment rate held steady at 5.3% in July.

            London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) Debacle [552]:
-- A London jury found Tom Hayes, a former trader at UBS and Citigroup, guilty of fraud for his part in trying to rig the LIBOR – the first criminal conviction of an individual for manipulating the widely used benchmark.  The judge sentenced Hayes to 14 years in prison.  He started serving the sentence immediately – one down many more to go.
-- So we don’t lose focus . . . the infamous 16, involved, international banks are:
  • ·      Barclays [UK] – US$454M fine [550, 701]; Singapore sanctions [600]; three charged {Johnson, Mathew, Contogoulas} [636]
  • ·      Bank of America [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      BTMU [Japan] – Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Citigroup [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600] [701]
  • ·      Credit Suisse [Switzerland] – Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Deutsche Bank [Germany] US$654M LIBOR profit [578]; set aside €500M (US$641M) for LIBOR liability [589]; Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Lloyds TSB [UK] – fined US$370M [659]
  • ·      HSBC [UK] – Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      HBOS [UK]
  • ·      JPMorgan Chase [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600][701]
  • ·      Norinchuckin [Japan]
  • ·      Rabobank [Netherlands] – fined €774M (£663M, US$1.06B); CEO resigned; 30 others censured [620]; three charged {Robson, Thompson, Motomura} [631]
  • ·      RBC [Canada]
  • ·      RBS [UK] – £390M (US$612.6M) in fines, 21 employees involved [582, 701]; Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      UBS [Switzerland] – US$1.5B fine, two charged {Hayes, Darin} [575, 701]; Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      West LB [Germany]

Added to the list by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [600]:
  • ·      ING [Netherlands] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      BNP Paribas [France] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Crédit Agricole [France] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      DBS [Singapore] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation [Singapore] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Standard Chartered [UK] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      United Overseas Bank [Singapore] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. [Australia] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Macquarie [Australia] Singapore sanctions [600]
  • ·      Commerzbank [Germany] Singapore sanctions [600]

Others involved:
  • ·      R.P. Martin Holdings Ltd. [UK] – two charged {Farr, Gilmour} [583]
  • ·      ICAP [UK] fined US$87M + three executives charged {Read, Wilkinson, Goodman} [615]

I trust none of us will lose sight of what these banks have done.  Lest we forget!

            Comments and contributions from Update no.711:
“Great place to visit indeed.  Last year, I visited my son who was posted at Fort Leavenworth, and we both went to the Museum.
“A couple of interesting pieces from today’s Post- one is about the teachers leaving Kansas due to the policies of the Governor and the legislature.  Not good
“And one about Senator Graham’s getting special treatment as a USAF Reservist…he made colonel in the Reserves, despite not putting in the requisite time or getting the required PME.  He essentially admits it when he says that he got promoted to O-5 and O-6 due to the work he did as a junior officer- ridiculous.  And remember that he claimed to be a Gulf War Veteran, when he never deployed overseas- he was activated and wrote wills in Dover AFB.”
My response:
            Yeah, in fact, you told me about the museum.  Thank you for that.
            Indeed . . . I think Brownback would love to return us to the way things were back in the Victorian era . . . when men were men and ships were made of wood.
            Lindsey was not the first and certainly will not be the last to benefit from political patronage.  So, I guess another example that we have our own form of royalty . . . divine right of kings.  I am not a fan of such behavior.
 . . . a follow-up comment:
“Remember Lyndon Johnson, during WWII, had a short tour in the Naval Reserve as a LCDR (direct commission).  He went on a flight in the Pacific Theatre in a Navy patrol plane as an ‘observor’- the plane was attacked by Japanese fighters and the patrol plane evaded the fighter and fought it off.  Johnson got the Silver Star- for not really doing anything on the flight. The crew might have gotten air medals – eps the pilots.  But nothing remotely rating the Silver Star.”
Johnson’s Silver Star citation:
“For gallantry in action in the vicinity of Port Moresby and Salamaua, New Guinea, on June 9, 1942. While on a mission of obtaining information in the Southwest Pacific area, Lieutenant Commander Johnson, in order to obtain personal knowledge of combat conditions, volunteered as an observer on a hazardous aerial combat mission over hostile positions in New Guinea. As our planes neared the target area they were intercepted by eight hostile fighters. When, at this time, the plane in which Lieutenant Commander Johnson was an observer, developed mechanical trouble and was forced to turn back alone, presenting a favorable target to the enemy fighters, he evidenced marked coolness in spite of the hazards involved. His gallant actions enabled him to obtain and return with valuable information.”
 . . . to which was added:
“More on this…of course when you see that MacArthur awarded the medal, one can readily see what was going on…it was a ‘deal.’
“Actually, the plane may not have even come under attack.”
 . . . my follow-up response:
            Thank you for the information.  Actually, I must admit, I did not know that aspect of history – quite an interesting contrast with MacArthur’s actions with the case of LtJG. John F. Kennedy, USNR.  Ambassador Kennedy sought a Medal of Honor for his son, while MacArthur wanted to court martial JFK for disobedience of a direct order – disengaging his engines while on patrol.  They compromised with a Navy – Marine Corps Medal.
            I’m sure there are many other examples of undeserved awards through history until this very day, e.g., Lindsey Graham.

My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)