Update from the
Heartland
No.806
5.6.17 – 11.6.17
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To
all,
The follow-up news items:
-- In the continuing observations regarding the new guy [375, 665, 705 & sub],
here is an knowledgeable opinion from Europe.
“Trump 'Most Un-American' U.S. President Seen in Years – Martin
Schulz, the former European Parliament president and Angela Merkel's challenger
in the German election, says in an interview with DER SPIEGEL that he views
Donald Trump as a threat to European security. He also calls on the chancellor
to do more to strengthen the EU.”
Interview Conducted by René Pfister
and Christoph
Schult
Der Spiegel
Published: June 06, 2017; 05:31 PM
Schulz said, “[W]e cannot allow ourselves to forget that
Trump is not the U.S.” He went
onto observe, “Trump is the most un-American U.S. president that the country
has had in a long time.” Based on
The Donald’s public performance during the campaign and his presidency so far,
I believe Schulz did not go far enough.
Yet, I cannot fault Schulz, he cannot be expected to know U.S.
history. I cannot think of a
president from Washington to Obama who acted more un-American than Trump.
-- Prime Minister May’s gamble with a snap elections [801] prior to beginning the Brexit
negotiations [796] apparently did
not pay off. The results were less
than she undoubtedly expected.
Party Seats Change
Conservative 318
-13
Labour 262 +32
SNP 35 -19
Lib Dem 12 +3
DUP 10 +2
Others 13
There are 650 seats in Parliament’s House of Commons; 326
are needed to hold a governing majority.
May’s election gamble lost the slim majority her Conservative Party
held. As of this Update, May is
reportedly seeking a coalition with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) – a
right-wing unionist political party in Northern Ireland. I understood May’s gamble. I do not understand the British
electorate weakening Her Majesty’s Government when the Brexit negotiations are
scheduled to begin on 19.June.2017.
We have to believe we will all be better for this challenge.
All
Muslims are NOT the problem today, any more so than all Japanese, or all
Germans, or all Italians were the problem 75 years ago. Regrettably, President Roosevelt
overrode his better judgment and issued Executive Order 9066 [19.2.1942] in the
hysteria after Pearl Harbor and the sinking of SS Cynthia Olson [7.12.1941].
We need Muslims in all nations and cultures to assist in rooting out and
exposing the bad men among them.
Four
assailants attacked the shrine of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and the
Parliament building of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) in Tehran. The attackers injured a dozen people in
the attacks. ISIL claimed responsibility
for the attacks. In that, the IRI
and the United States share a common enemy. Perhaps someday, we can find the path to work together, and
share common prosperity and peace.
I watched the testimony of Director of National Intelligence
Daniel Ray ‘Dan’ Coats and National Security Agency Director Admiral Michael S.
‘Mike’ Rogers, USN, before the Senate Intelligence Committee. They were pointedly questioned about
whether President Trump ever pressured or ordered to help end an investigation
focused on campaign associates. They
steadfastly refused to answer questions on whether they had been asked to
influence the probe or to say anything that they knew to be untrue. We must respect their loyalty and
respect for the Office of the President, and perhaps even to Trump himself;
however, their testimony was deeply disappointing . . . in our search for the
truth.
The testimony
of former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation James Brien Comey,
Jr., before the Senate Intelligence Committee, proved to be informative and yet
tragically disappointing. I
quietly prayed for a smoking gun; he did not deliver. Instead, we are treated to a he-said/he-said situation. I wanted to reprint his entire
testimony, word-for-word, but that is not fair or reasonable. There was so much in his words that
spoke volumes. Yet, if I boiled
all of his testimony to one sentence, it would be: “I was honestly concerned
that he might lie about the nature of our meeting, and so I thought it really
important to document.” That one
sentence carries libraries of connotations. So, if this whole affair comes down to “he-said / he-said,”
then I have no choice but to believe James Comey. He holds orders of magnitude more credibility than does The
Donald, full stop!
The
President likes to say, “believe me,” to virtually anything and
everything he says. Unfortunately,
quite a few Americans, perhaps even most Americans, do not believe anything he says – not a word. He has consistently, repeatedly and
persistently associated those two words with falsehoods and serious twisting of
the facts. Bottom line, Donald, we
do NOT believe you. As a proud
citizen of this Grand Republic, I find that observation tragic on a gargantuan
scale . . . and we cannot believe our commander-in-chief prima facie.
If
you have to ask for loyalty, you are not likely to achieve loyalty. Further, loyalty is a two-way
street. Demanding unilateral
loyalty is a clear sign of weakness and lack of confidence in yourself and
those around you. I have not a
sliver of doubt that is exactly what The Donald asked of Comey.
The
House of Representatives passed [House: 233-186-0-11(5)] a bill short titled: Financial
CHOICE Act of 2017 (H.R. 10). The
long title is: “To create hope and opportunity for investors, consumers, and
entrepreneurs by ending bailouts and Too Big to Fail, holding Washington and
Wall Street accountable, eliminating red tape to increase access to capital and
credit, and repealing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that make America
less prosperous, less stable, and less free, and for other purposes.” The House bill has good elements and
not-so-good elements. It still
must work its way through the Senate, and if necessary joint reconciliation
before it is submitted to the President for approval. The words “hope and opportunity” in the title leave me
rather chilled, actually. This
bill will not benefit John Q. Citizen, like you and me, but will definitely
benefit the big money folks of Wall Street and the banks. We need to keep an eye on this one.
On
Sunday, Puerto Ricans voted overwhelmingly to become the 51st state
in a nonbinding referendum. Preliminary results indicated 97% favored statehood, with 90%
of votes counted. Unfortunately,
the turnout of eligible voters only reached about 23%, reflecting the success
of a boycott effort led by opponents. Opponents of statehood seek to undermine
the credibility of the referendum by claiming the vote results do not represent
the will of the people. We shall
see how this turns out.
Comments and contributions from Update no.805:
Comment to the Blog:
“I saw the picture of Kathy Griffin with the bloody head of Trump
uncensored. I literally didn’t ‘get’ the joke until you pointed it out. The image brought me about as much
nausea as a picture several years ago of Obama lynched. Nausea or not, I support free speech. However, just because it’s legal to do
something, that does not make it a good idea or mean that one’s creation will
have the intended effect. Ms
Griffin has suffered more than the creator of the Obama image. Let’s move on to more important issues.
“Trump’s ‘style’/personality is all about aggression and
intimidation. He is not even aware
of the possibility of working together with others to achieve common goals. People either praise and obey him or
they are his enemies. Hence his
adversarial approach to the Paris Accord and pretty much everything else. Let us remember that ‘Make America Great
Again’ was only a campaign slogan and has no meaning to Trump or his minions.
“Economics is grossly oversimplified by all parties in the
political arena. Trade deficits
are not invariable and unalloyed losses, and demand is not based only on
product quality and suitability. The
‘strong’ dollar is a factor here. I’m certain there are several others.
“As a progressive, I sincerely wish the Democrats would lead
progressives. That has not
happened since at least the Bill Clinton administration. I didn’t vote for Secretary Clinton, but
I can’t say I regret that. The
sources of her campaign and personal funds combined with her personal history
in the Senate and as Secretary of State were the overwhelming factors for me. She is a corporate tool. Just because she presents herself better
than the jackass who won does not mean her bottom line results would be better.
Also, she and her party have
refused all responsibility for their failures. That aggravates the situation. The U.S. is overdue for real change, but the Democratic Party
is part of what needs changing, not the agent of change.”
My response to the
Blog:
Re:
Griffin. Agreed.
Re:
“Make America Great Again.” For
having no meaning, it sure is bandied about a lot.
Re:
economics of trade. Agreed. Unfortunately, the Ugly American-in-Chief
has yet to learn that reality. I
doubt highly he cares a hoot to learn.
Re:
Clinton & Democrats. Thank you
for sharing your perspective. We
may hold different rationale but the bottom line remains the same.
Another contribution:
“I agree with you on Kathy Griffin. I think she messed up in her damage
control post the graphic, by trying to say Trump was trying to destroy
her. She initially had an ok response to her snafu, but then started digging her
hole bigger.
“I also have entertained Griffin's graphic was symbolic and
used on the global scale of theater, for other sinister purposes.
“Cap, I agree we humans are not doing so well at being good
stewards of our Earth. We have
done a terrible job.
“Most interesting parallels, I thinking you very keenly
named Cap, to Rome, and where we are today with Trump.
“Trump in my mind is about CORPORATISM, it is his THE ART OF
THE DEAL, he sees himself as a businessman (CEO) of the most powerful nation on
Earth, though yes, we may fall like Rome.”
My reply:
Re:
Griffin faux pas. Agreed. Her apology was heartfelt. Her subsequent yammering was whining. She has made a career, denigrating
people; her whining about the table being turned is not a good look.
Re:
stewards of our earth.
Unfortunately, Trump and his ilk feel no responsibility for the health
of the planet. Whether mankind’s
existence is affecting global warming verges on irrelevant. Polluting the water, the earth, the
atmosphere is wrong and detrimental to the health of the planet, quite akin to
second hand smoke in a room. I do
not need another lesson on pollutants.
Profit is NOT the bottom line.
Re:
Corporatism. It sure appears to be
so.
Re:
Roman Empire. The Roman Empire did
not fail because of its power, but rather by its complacency and turning
inward.
My
very best wishes to all. Take care
of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
I’m not sure how Martin Schulz or you arrive at “un-American” as the term for Trump’s insanity. He continues policies and practices dating back to Reagan and including Presidents of both major parties, except the trade agreements that began with Bill Clinton. (And Trump has only stopped one trade agreement. The rest are in place.) The rule violations are no news either, on anyone’s part. The only real difference is that Trump does these dangerous things openly. I agree with many negative adjectives to describe Trump: insane, corrupt, random, racist, and hateful, among others. However, “un-American” only applies if Americans refuse to look in the mirror.
I suppose you see the British electorate as focused on Brexit, based on what you wrote. Perhaps they voted to stop their Trump-style government element, as the French and Austrians did.
Your “terrorist” notion still seems to focus only on Muslims. Do you respond at all to the white supremacists, Nazis, et al.? They kill many more people in this country.
Director of National “Intelligence” Coats and NSA Director Rogers have shown us how often Trump correctly assumes people will not tell the truth about him. Trump continues to behave exactly like a middle-school bully, and it’s working better for him than the rest of us ever expected. Former FBI Director Comey finds himself in an extremely difficult position. I see him as taking the honorable road of telling his story in the most literal and un-spun account he can give. The lack of a satisfying “smoking gun” merely reflects reality. Even the Donald is not insane enough to give Comey a direct order to stop the investigation. I would love it if Trump produced tapes of his conversations, but they probably do not exist.
Of course I don’t believe anything Trump says. My particular brain specializes in words, and anyone who uses that many superlatives (“greatest, the greatest ever!”) and loaded words (loser, nasty, genius, fraud) has no interest in whether their claims are true. That is the closest thing to an absolute I have ever seen about the way people use words. Those who wish either to tell the truth or to lie convincingly use more moderate words.
Puerto Rico’s status will be an issue into the future. Puerto Ricans themselves disagree. The only clear fact is that the current situation harms the US citizens of Puerto Rico.
Calvin,
Re: “un-American.” There are ideals that define what it means to an American: tolerance, compassionate, respect for others, love of freedom, et al. Associating the new guy with Reagan or any person who has occupied the Oval Office is an insult to history. Like Colbert said recently, “This is the next level of weird.” Way understated, it seems to me. ““un-American” only applies if Americans refuse to look in the mirror.” This is a rather interesting statement. The implication is there are no American ideals, as each American citizen defines American ideals. So, there is no whole, only individual dots on the page. Interesting concept.
Are you suggesting that the May government is or has a “Trump-style government element”? The election for individual MPs in each district hardly seems like a consolidated effort. The ever so slight shift to the left seems more like a backhanded step away from Brexit, actually; which in turn complicates the process. It remains my opinion that the British voters did not take the Brexit referendum seriously last year.
Re: “Your ‘terrorist’ notion still seems to focus only on Muslims.” If that’s how it seems, then I have not been successful in communicating. I respond to ALL terrorist acts, including white supremacists. Do you need me to cite my condemnation of non-Islamo-fascist terrorist attacks? Timothy McViegh received the punishment he deserved, just not fast enough; but, he received the due process he was entitled to as American citizen, regardless of his disgusting mutations.
Re: Trump/Comey. Well said. I agree in toto. Like so many Trump actions, he huffs & puffs and blusters about. Clinton lobbed cruise missiles around when he got bad news. Trump accuses others, e.g., Obama wiretapping him. His Oval Office tape recording “hint” with respect to his 1v1 conservation with Comey is most likely exactly the same thing . . . just more hot air to distract our attention. Trump seems to be doing everything he possibly can to create the image of his guilt.
Bottom line: Trump is, has always been and will always be a snake-oil salesman, selling his particular brand of elixir potion cure-all to people who want to believe in the professed properties rather than truly knowing what the snake-oil actually is and does. These guys have been around for centuries and millennia. He is just the most prominent of his kind.
Re: Puerto Rico. Agreed.
“That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment