Update from the Heartland
No.697
20.4.15 – 26.4.15
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To all,
Quite a few folks noted the neglect of my
website . . . last updated in 2007.
The reasons for such neglect are moot and otherwise irrelevant; they are
what they are and history. Having
sent away the manuscript submittal package for Book IV of my To So Few series
of historical novels, I worked with a professional web developer to produce a
new website with a more up-to-date appearance, accessibility and currency of
the content. Some have reported
problems communicating with me via eMail this week; I expect the problems were
an artifact of the transition to the new host servers. I urge everyone to visit, browse the
content, and offer whatever constructive criticism may come to you.
The editing tools available with the
new website are immensely easier to use, thus we should all expect the new site
to remain current henceforth, as my new books are released for publication. Suggestions for improvement are always
welcome.
The follow-up news items:
-- The Justice Department announced the arrest of Navinder
Sarao by U.K. authorities and charges against Sarao for fraud, manipulation and
a high-speed trading practice known as ‘spoofing,’ The charges allege Sarao was
the principal contributor (root cause) of the 6.May.2010 “flash crash” in which
the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 1000 points [438, 459]. I trust he shall
feel the full weight of the law and join his fellow traveler Bernie Madoff [365, 378]. Greed that
causes destruction is NOT good, despite what Gordon Gekko professed (1987).
-- Former Director of Central Intelligence General David
Howell Petraeus, USA (Ret.) [USMA 1974] [569, 570] pleaded
guilty to a charge of mishandling classified materials he provided to his
former mistress and biographer. Under
a plea deal, he is expected to face a fine and probation, but no prison time.
Comments
and contributions from Update no.696:
Comment to the Blog:
“It's good to see at least a few of the Blackwater criminals get
long sentences.
“I pay my taxes without complaint, and I share the desire to see
them used well. The fact that people in the U.S. pay less taxes than those in
civilized nations means that we need to make difficult decisions about how that
money should be spent. I probably seek a different balance than you, but I
certainly agree that those who ‘seek to scam or take advantage of our
generosity’ should be stopped. To that end, we probably need to stop most
corporate tax breaks and to begin taxing the wealthy at a rate fair to the rest
of us. That remains unlikely so long as campaign spending knows no limits. Have
you noticed that the Koch Brothers plan to spend $900 billion on the upcoming
Presidential election cycle? That's obscene, but I'm sure they will make a good
investment of it if their properties win enough elections.
“Speaking of government priorities, I find it sad that the United
States government has foregone its legitimate support of science and
technology, including space science. A few of those privatized enterprises may
succeed in making money, but the control and the prestige will be lost to the
people as a whole.
“I doubt it helps much, but you have the nation's sympathy about
living in a Kansas that has gone insane. I hope less for mercy than for the
total absence of any enforcement effort of the new law on TANF money. Kansas
nowadays has no money for such nonsense even if it were possible to enforce
such a law effectively. The Brownback regime passed that thing mainly to
reinforce the governor's claim to extreme conservatism, or possibly to set up
an insanity plea should he be held accountable.
“In any territorial dispute, sooner or later one of the parties
seeks to cement its claim. Apparently, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has
done that in the case of the many-named island in the South China Sea. That
would be part of the PRC's wider effort to fill the open place of world leader
that the U.S. has vacated in favor of plutocracy. Foreign ownership of U.S.
investments, even government bonds, is another facet of this change.
“Operation Paperclip probably benefited the United States as a
whole, at least for a time. Discussing the ethics of spy operations is a waste
of time. Secrecy precludes any real ethical limits. All parties confidently
expected that they would not be called to account for their actions during
their lifetimes. They were correct in the case of Operation Paperclip.”
My response to the
Blog:
Re:
Blackwater. ‘Nuf said.
Re:
taxes. I suspect you meant million
rather than billion, but no matter how many zero’s . . . a hellava lot of money
– an obscene amount of money, all to buy influence. I further suspect they will simply write off those campaign
expenditures as business “expenses” and thus diminish their period profit and
thus their corporate taxes, i.e., We, the People, are paying for their largess
and influence purchases. Somehow, Citizens
United must be overcome.
Re:
USG funding science & technology.
Agreed. The primary
advantage of public funding of such endeavors is the outcome or product(s) are
in the public domain, which means the most people benefit. One of my biggest such projects is
embryonic stem cell research.
Re:
Brownback. Spot on!
Re:
PRC. Again, spot on! They subscribe to the theory that
“possession is 9/10 of the law.”
Salient question: where will their neighbors draw the line? What is too much?
Re:
Operation PAPERCLIP. OK, no
argument. Nolo Contendere.
. . . follow-up comment:
“I was unable to send an email response, so this will have to do.
“I did indeed mean to say that the Koch Brothers are spending $900
million, (not billion) on the
election cycle. This is more than a write-off; investing in politicians has a
very strong return on investment for large investors.”
. . . my follow-up response:
I
hope the problem has not been on my end.
I have been working to get my new website up & running. Looks good, but I have had problems with
my eMail over the last few days as servers were switched over. So things should be back to normal
soon. I will make an announcement
in this week’s Update.
Yes,
you are quite right. My only point
is, at least the part they write off as a business expense is ultimately paid
for by the taxpayers. Their
benefit vastly exceeds the dollars they spend, such is the world of the money
elite (or perhaps more appropriately, the money royalty) of this country. I suspect there will be a correction in
time.
. . . a follow-up comment to the
follow-up:
“This is mostly a test email to see if it will send.
“However, the ‘correction in time’ part has always somehow come
from the public on one guise or another disrupting the oligarchy, plutocracy,
or monarchy that was in place. Often enough, that does not happen and the
nation in question deteriorates into a lesser entity.”
. . . my follow-up response to the follow-up
comment:
Appeared
to come through just fine. I
believe the problems of transition are behind me.
I
understand and appreciate your observation. However, I shall offer a contrarian perspective. With mounting signs of abuse, Congress
passed the Sherman
Antitrust Act [PL 51-I-647; 26 Stat. 209] on 2.July.1890. It took the USG another 20 years to
break up the Standard Oil monopoly – Standard Oil v. United States [221
U.S. 1 (1911)], 15.May.1911. Some
could argue it took 90 years – break-up of AT&T on 1.January.1984. The process did not lessen us. We will overcome the obstacles we face
today.
My very best wishes to all. Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
Your new web site is clean, clear, and well suited to its purpose. You have a good result for your effort.
The only design quibbles I found are (a) no apparent link to this blog, and (b) you mention Wichita prominently, which carries a much more localized and parochial connotation than your career and viewpoint deserve. You carry experience and insight derived from traveling and working across a large slice of the world. The local reference takes away from that.
Calvin,
Thank you for your comments.
Re: Blog link. Actually, it is at the top of the “Other Writing” page. I should be more specific on my Home page.
Re: Wichita “Kansas.” Well, now, that you mention it, my location has no bearing on my writing. And, again, thank you very much for your generous words.
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment