Update from the
Heartland
No.659
28.7.14 – 3.8.14
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To all,
The follow-up news items:
-- An interesting alternative perspective in the on-going
Eastern Ukraine situation [640, 657]:
“MH17: China Defends Russia, Criticizes the West – China’s
state media has strongly condemned the Western response to MH17, and largely
backed Russia.”
By Zachary Keck
thediplomat.com
Published: July 24, 2014
I suppose the PRC finds it hard to condemn Russia’s
hegemonic actions in the light of their actions against their neighbors.
-- The EU and U.S. have further expanded sanctions against
Russia for their continued surrogate aggression in Eastern Ukraine [640, 657]. The more the
West tightens the sanction screws, the more those actions will hurt the Russian
people rather than the real culprits in this situation.
-- With unusual frankness, CIA Director John Owen Brennan
apologized to the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee after an agency
investigation determined that its employees improperly searched computers used
by committee staffers to review classified files on interrogations of prisoners
[639]. Now, I would like to see an apology from Senator Feinstein
for the committee’s staffers accessing CIA documents beyond their
authorization.
-- What can we say about Gaza [657]? Ceasefire, no
ceasefire! The horror of it all! What more can be said? Here is another perspective.
“Gaming Israel and Palestine”
Geopolitical
Weekly, Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
Published: TUESDAY, JULY 29, 2014 - 03:04
Israeli-Palestinian
behavior is quite like addiction, and in this case, both parties are addicted
to this damnable violence. There
has been evidence that one side or the other sought peace in the past. Until they both want peace at the same
time, there will be no peace. Imagine
what might happen is the world agreed to a Palestinian state on the west bank
with the Palestinian Authority.
Hamas would further be isolated.
As
noted in this forum several times, duality is a powerful force in relationships
even among nation-states. They
both need bad guys to focus their people, followers and supporters. Eventually, the cycle will be broken .
. . perhaps not in my lifetime, but there is always hope.
The House of Representatives passed
Resolution 676 by a vote of 225-201-0-6, to authorize the Speaker to pursue legal
action against the President of the United States over the implementation of
the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [PL 111-148; 124 Stat.
119] [432] and the Health Care and
Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 [PL 111-152; 124
Stat. 1029]. I suppose in a small
way I can understand and appreciate the frustration of the House majority. Yet, in total, this action is far more
baffling and disturbing than understandable. It is not clear whether the Speaker or General Counsel of
the House will actually file a complaint against the President. Perhaps just Resolution 676 is
sufficient to placate the majority.
If the House does proceed, the Speaker has several very important and
high hurdles to even reach the judgment stage, not least of which is judicial standing. There are significant precedents in the
President’s favor – a lot of history.
There is no complaint to review other than the resolution text, so it is
difficult to assess. At this
stage, this initiative appears ill advised and emotional, and far worse, an
extraordinary waste of what minimal capacity the House has had for the last
decade.
News from the economic front:
-- The Commerce Department reported the U.S. Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) increased at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.0% in 2Q2014,
after suffering the sharpest contraction in 1Q2014 since the recession ended.
-- In its July policy statement, the Federal Reserve said, "Economic
activity rebounded in the second quarter," noting the labor market is
improving, the jobless rate declining and inflation moving closer to its 2%
objective. The Fed added the
qualifier that a range of indicators suggest their is still weakness in the job
market. They also expected to
continue reducing its purchases of mortgage and Treasury bonds to US$25B, which
would keep the central bank on track to end the stimulus program by October.
-- A federal judge in New York ordered Bank of America to
pay US$1.27B penalty after the bank was found liable for Countrywide Financial
Corporation's “Hustle” mortgage program, in which the lender churned out
mortgage loans with an eye on quantity, not quality, and then sold them to
investors like mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The bank is assessing its options for
an appeal.
-- The Labor Department reported nonfarm employment rose by
a seasonally adjusted 209,000 in July. The unemployment rate ticked up slightly to 6.2% in July from
6.1% in June. The jobless rate has
fallen 1.1 percentage points since July 2013, when it was 7.3%, continuing to
show strength in the labor market and the broader economy.
London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
Debacle [552]:
-- Lloyds Banking Group becomes the 7th financial
institution to reach a deal with U.S. and U.K. authorities in the long-running investigation
regarding widespread efforts to manipulate the LIBOR, and other widely used
interest-rate benchmarks. The bank
will pay roughly US$370M in fines for attempting to rig benchmark interest
rates.
-- So we don’t lose focus . . . the infamous 16, involved,
international banks are:
- · Barclays [UK] – US$454M fine [550]; Singapore sanctions [600]; three charged {Johnson, Mathew, Contogoulas} [636]
- · Bank of America [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · BTMU [Japan] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Citigroup [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Credit Suisse [Switzerland] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Deutsche Bank [Germany] – US$654M LIBOR profit [578]; set aside €500M (US$641M) for LIBOR liability [589]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Lloyds TSB [UK] – fined US$370M [659]
- · HSBC [UK] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · HBOS [UK]
- · JPMorgan Chase [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Norinchuckin [Japan]
- · Rabobank [Netherlands] – fined €774M (£663M, US$1.06B); CEO resigned; 30 others censured [620]; three charged {Robson, Thompson, Motomura} [631]
- · RBC [Canada]
- · RBS [UK] – £390M (US$612.6M) in fines, 21 employees involved [582]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- · UBS [Switzerland] – US$1.5B fine, two charged {Hayes, Darin} [575]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- · West LB [Germany]
Added to the list by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [600]:
- · ING [Netherlands] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · BNP Paribas [France] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Crédit Agricole [France] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · DBS [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Standard Chartered [UK] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · United Overseas Bank [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. [Australia] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Macquarie [Australia] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- · Commerzbank [Germany] – Singapore sanctions [600]
Others involved:
- · R.P. Martin Holdings Ltd. [UK] – two charged {Farr, Gilmour} [583]
- · ICAP [UK] – fined US$87M + three executives charged {Read, Wilkinson, Goodman} [615]
I trust none of us will lose sight of what these banks have
done. Lest we forget!
Comments
and contributions from Update no.658:
“A couple of points. Israel is taking heat for direct tank
fire on a school- not arty fire. Three direct shots that were
fired. UN officials say they tried to get time for it to be
abandoned. The Israelis have a different story. From what I have
seen so far, I would believe the UN people.
“This is from Andrew Sullivan’s blog relating to the
beginning of this mess.”
by Andrew Sullivan
Published: JUL 27 2014 @ 9:15PM
My response:
So,
the basic premise of Sullivan’s Blog opinion is that Israel used the murder of
three boys to hammer Hamas – an opportunity not to be passed up, since they
just wanted to kill Hamas militants or perhaps just Palestinians.
To
my knowledge, the cross-border tunnels were not created or used by Israel, and
they did not create the cross-border incursions.
Let
us assume that Israel made everything up, created the entire situation, killed
the three boys, killed the Palestinian boy, even fired the rockets into their
own country . . . for what purpose?
. . . some more settlements?
. . . obliterate the Palestinian people? . . . deny the Palestinians their statehood?
If
Sullivan’s opinion is true and accurate, the outcome could never be what the
Israelis seek. Also if true, the
violence in that region will remain perpetual. It has already been more than my lifetime, and neither of us
is likely to see peace in that region, which brings me to the conclusion. Let us grant Palestinian statehood and
let them fight it out state-to-state.
Who knows it might just be the paradigm shift required.
Round two:
“The Israelis used the pretense of looking for the boys to
run their operation into Palestinian areas. They had the goal going into
Hamas areas, only later they found the tunnels. In view of the fact that
it has come out that the authorities knew the boys had been killed almost right
away, and that the kidnappers were outliers to Hamas and were known to
free-lance, their placing the blame on Hamas during the three weeks was a
sham. Former DIA acquaintances think they had this multi-week
operation planned – due to logistics and manning unique to the IDF- and were
waiting for a pretext. The searches of Hamas outposts were done under
pretext of looking for the boys, and as a result, the tunnels were found.
Not to excuse the Hamas starting shooting later, but ‘til then,
this year had been very quiet as far as rockets.
“The DIA people think the Israeli goal has not so much to do
with tunnels or rockets, but stopping the Two-State solution. The leadership of
the Israeli government is very strongly anti-Two-State; the foreign minister is
very outspoken against it. Netanyahu, while not overtly anti-Two State,
has done nothing to promote it and his party is against it. With Hamas
and Fatah moving together, that would have put more Palestinian pressure on
that measure. The main goal in all this is to prevent Hamas-Fatah closure
and to weaken Hamas.
“A pox on everyone I suppose. The Israelis maybe
making another bad mistake re: Hamas. They ‘used’ Hamas at one point to
go against other factions, only to see Hamas grow into a threat. If Hamas is
eliminated, then the ISIS is expected to take over. The DIA folks are
very, very concerned about that possibility, and have seen signs that ISIS is
in Gaza already. And ISIS is anticipated to be a greater threat than
Hamas. Not only to Egypt, but to Jordan and Egypt.
“A related concern, is that if Israel continues to kill
Palestinian civilians at the great rate, the country could be branded an ‘Enemy
of Islam’ by a Muslim leader, perhaps Khameni of Iran. Even though a
Shi’a, such a decree would be devastating and would turn Muslim countries, both
Shi’a and Sunni against Israel.
“A greater worry is that if the Turkish humanitarian
organization tries another flotilla to Gaza, as was tried in 2010. There
are reports of such a flotilla being formed and further, reports that the
Turkish Navy will accompany it. If so, and the IDF uses force to stop it
like before, Turkey might invoke Article 5 of the NATO Charter (mutual
defense). That would put us and the rest of NATO into a quandary.
We have treaty obligations to Turkey- and none to Israel. And Turkish PM
Erdogan, has been making some strident comments lately. With
the destruction in Gaza, a humanitarian flotilla is something that could be
expected, especially when the fighting ends. This final scenario is one
that has people most worried.”
. . . my response to round two:
Re:
Israeli incursion. OK, if the boys
were an excuse, what was the purpose of the original incursion? I thought the IDF had plenty of
evidence of the tunnels . . . perhaps not the full extent but at least their
existence. What was the IDF’s
original mission?
Re:
two-state solution. Why would
Israel not want a Palestinian state?
Well, with at least the Palestinian Authority on the West Bank? I know Jerusalem remains an issue. IMHO, the West Bank should be fully
recognized with statehood. The
Jewish settlements in Palestine would be part & parcel to the territory of
Palestine. Jewish settlers would
have a time window to leave or become Palestinian citizens. And, I would make Jerusalem whole and
the capital of Israel; Muslims have to get visas to visit lots of shrines. The pressure on Hamas would be
enormous, if the Gaza Palestinians watched normalization on the West Bank,
while they suffered continued isolation under Hamas. I suspect
even the Palestinians in southern Lebanon would seek the peace of statehood.
Re:
Hamas. I am not so sure the
Israelis are making a mistake relative to Hamas. Hamas remains committed to the extermination of Israel. I am not aware of the same professed
hostilities by Fatah.
Re:
ISIS. I certainly agree with the
threat. Those guys are clearly
demonstrated bad guys.
Re:
Enemy of Islam. The IRI has
repeatedly proclaimed their hostility to Israel. Sure, the Israelis must be as careful as possible, but Hamas
cannot be allowed to hide behind civilians. Further, I am not sure how we define “civilian” anymore
given our enemy’s propensity to use children and women in burqas for suicide
missions and launch rockets from mosques and schools. Hamas wants true civilian deaths. Further, I suspect some of the “civilians” killed are
culpable and not innocent. War is
war.
Re:
Turkish relief flotilla. If the
Turks pursue a relief convoy, the Israelis and Turks can coordinate a
pre-sailing inspection & sealing of the cargo & passengers to avoid any
confrontation. Yet, at the bottom
line, the Israelis cannot allow Hamas to be resupplied with weapons or articles
of war. The IN would have to
shadow the convoy to prevent mid-cruise supplementing of the cargo. Perhaps other navy units could do the
same thing to maintain some semblance of neutrality.
We
must think outside the box. Well,
actually, the Israelis must think outside the box. Resisting the two-state solution is useless and futile, and
I do not think we should continue to be held hostage by right-wing Israelis.
Another contribution
from a third party contributor:
“The Russians have never been very good at time-tables
either. Recall that WW III was /supposed/ to have started today.”
Comment:
“All the Super Powers are running on unsynchronized ATOMIC
clocks (you like that, now that was clever on my part).”
My reply:
Too
much chest-beating on both sides of this issue. Uncle Vlad may be serving his reconstituted Politburo.
My very best wishes to all. Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
Cap,
Editing note: I am doing this one in WordPad, having deep sixed the Linux for now. Please advise if anything causes problems.
I propose a simpler reason China might defend Russia's position re Ukraine. Perhaps they would rather Putin expanded to his west rather than attack China or its near neighbors. I continue to see an assumption on all sides that the shoot-down was deliberate. I find that hard to believe.
I would like to see John Brennan fired or retired for his actions in hacking Senate information. While I'm not a Feinstein fan, let us remember that the CIA is supposed to serve the government, not the other way around. In order to appropriately manage the spy community, the highest levels of government must necessarily know what they have done.
I rather like your linked article from Geopolitical Weekly, "Gaming Israel and Palestine." Mr. Friedman disregards the human cost of all this bloodshed, but then so do all the players. His assessment of the balance issue is spot on, although I find him a little optimistic with his hope for a peaceful resolution in fifty years. Each side wants its ethnic/religious group to triumph over the other and will fight to the death for that goal. Both sides, in that way, resemble Nazi Germany. Short-sighted people have carried on the underlying conflict for millennia, and I believe they will continue until one side exterminates everyone on the other side who is able to pick up arms. Maybe everyone. Neither Mr. Friedman nor I see a reason to debate the details of the latest incident. The important debate for the US is why we continue to put our wealth into this conflict.
The seeds of the dimwitted lawsuit against the President of the United States were planted on Election Night of his first term. If you re-read the statements of the Republicans from that night and the next day, you will understand that they oppose Obama personally to the exclusion of all else, including the good of the nation.
The economy continues to improve on paper. I would like to bring up an issue that receives little discussion. One can easily find evidence that many of the unemployed served in jobs that were not sent overseas or anywhere else but were permanently eliminated by automation or other technology. Does anyone believe that the debatable growth in the economy will replace those jobs with others for which the unemployed might be trained?
Calvin,
I cannot see any impact regarding your switch in word processing systems.
Re: PRC. Valid point . . . although Russia has shown comparatively little interest in the East, perhaps because they have far more land buffer than they have to the west.
Re: Brennan. I am not quite sure why you are down on Brennan beyond he is the DCI left holding the bag? The disagreement between the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee staffers occurred well before Brennan’s tenure. He did the proper thing it seems to me. What those Senate staffers did was quite wrong and should have been prosecuted; however, what some folks in the CIA did as a consequence was far more wrong on multiple levels.
Re: Palestine. The crusades ended after 150 years. The perpetual war between France and England ended after 500 years. We could argue Islam has been at war with anyone who does not believe as they believe since its creation in 632 AD. The genesis of the latest violence is caught up in the tangle of propaganda. The solution must exceed these damnable flare-ups. To my thinking, the solution rests a Palestinian State.
Re: “The important debate for the US is why we continue to put our wealth into this conflict.” The support of the United States for a Jewish homeland has been strong since 1922. As long as the IRI, Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, profess their objective as the annihilation of Israel, I cannot see U.S. policy changing.
Re: House lawsuit. Agreed. I see the H. Res. 676 action as pure political theater for the pending election with little prospect to even reach judgment, set aside success.
Re: “Does anyone believe that the debatable growth in the economy will replace those jobs with others for which the unemployed might be trained?” My simple answer: yes. I think the more germane question is, who is willing to be re-trained? And, who will pay for the training? The individual unemployed person clearly cannot. So, the choices are narrowed to corporations, the State, or some combination thereof. I am also concerned about the will of some unemployed or underemployed to seek another profession.
“That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment