Update from the Heartland
No.600
10.6.13 – 16.6.13
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To all,
The follow-up news items:
-- The National Security Agency (NSA), its PRISM
surveillance program and the Snowden treason [599] remain active debate topics, as noted in the Comment Section
below as well as within our clan. Our youngest son and I had quite the debate last night [a
week ago, Sunday] on this issue.
Boiled down, whether the NSA monitored message content or just recorded
the message metadata is a fait accompli; what really matters, the
potential for abuse is astronomical.
Whether they read the message . . . they can! Unless or until we can establish firewalls between the
Intelligence Community and the politicos & law enforcement & spec ops
operatives, we must have some form of checks & balances in place; carte
blanche with the power of these tools is simply not acceptable no
matter how valuable they are in the War on Islamic Fascism.
P.S.: Not surprisingly, the surveillance question is rapidly
expanding to virtually all means of modern communications across all borders
around the world. If Snowden’s
actions are not treason, then I suppose there is no such thing as treason. He cannot hide behind some altruistic,
the people-must-know nonsense.
There can be no doubt that what he has done is aiding and abetting the
enemy during time of war.
-- The federal government announced this week they will take
steps to comply with Judge Edward Korman’s order in Tummino v. Hamburg [USDC
NY ED no. 12-cv-763 (ERK)(VVP) (2013); 4.April.2013] [595], namely, they intend to approve the Plan B emergency
contraceptive for sale to any age person without a prescription. Unfortunately, in the government’s near
infinite bureaucracy, the manufacturer must start the application process
again, from the beginning, which means the actual approval process may take another
year to achieve. I suppose on the
plus-side, the delay time gives parents another year to prepare their children
for that responsibility, to avoid the need for emergency contraceptives as well
as its proper use should the need arise.
Regrettably, I doubt many parents will do so, as that is not the
socially conservative culture in this Grand Republic. We prefer ignorance over knowledge when it comes to the
sexual education of our children.
Bishop John Shelby Spong led the
Episcopal Diocese of Newark for 24 years until his retirement in 2001, and
offered a clear, concise explanation of religion, regardless of denomination or
practice. For your consideration,
URL: http://www.upworthy.com/best-explanation-of-religion-i-have-ever-heard-and-im-practically-an-atheist?c=upw1
On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued
their decision in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v.
Myriad Genetics, Inc. [569 U.S. ___ (2013); no. 12-398]. I have not read the ruling, as yet;
however, I wanted to note the unanimous decision against Myriad Genetics, Inc.,
which “owns” the patent to the BRCA1 gene – the marker for susceptibility to
breast cancer. Angelina Jolie’s
decision to undergo a prophylactic, radical, double mastectomy based upon BRCA1
test results – an expensive test she can afford but many others cannot – has
highlighted the benefit and application of genetic screening. As a consequence of the Myriad
Genetics ruling, the breast cancer, genetically disposed, screening
test is expected to dramatically lower the price, making the critical testing
more accessible to other people. I
look forward to reading the decision soon.
News from the economic front:
-- Standard & Poor's maintained its U.S. credit rating
at a double-A-plus and raised its prognosis to stable from negative, citing the
strengthening U.S. economy and improving cooperation in Congress. I am not so sure of the latter reason,
but then again, it does not take much to improve from dysfunctional. So far, S&P is the only major credit
ratings agency to do so.
-- The Bank of Japan monetary policy board announced their
intention to hold the banks’ monetary program steady, buying enough assets to
expand Japan’s monetary base at an annual pace of about ¥60T (US$612B), to
achieve an inflation target of 2% per annum. The board noted an increase in exports and industrial
production as well as improving “resilience” in private consumption.
-- The Wall Street
Journal reported that seven of the largest U.S. banks, including Bank of
America, J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup, will have an additional two years to comply
with the “swaps push-out” rule and spin off some lucrative derivatives trades
into separate units. The banks
will now have until 16.July.2015. I see something quite different in this little news item;
this is yet one more reason those damnable, too-big-to fail banks must be
broken up to separate the boring banking business from their risky gambling
activities.
-- The Wall Street
Journal also reported that last year the U.S. posted the biggest increase
in oil production in the world and the largest increase in U.S. history. The increased production comes primarily
from newly developed, tight-oil fields such as those in North Dakota. The surge in fresh crude supplies is helping to restrain
global oil prices and advance U.S. foreign-policy goals.
London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
Debacle [552]:
-- The Financial Times
[of London] reported that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has
dramatically expanded the global rate-rigging probe. They sanctioned 20 international banks after finding that
133 traders attempted to manipulate three different kinds of interest rate and
foreign exchange rate benchmarks. Rather
than fine the banks, the MAS ordered banks to leave more money on deposit – at
zero interest – with the central bank for one year. Also, the worst offenders were ordered to increase their
reserves by more than S$1B (US$800M), while others were required to increase
reserves by S$700-800M. The usual
suspects are among the identified banks.
I have updated the infamous-16 list and added the additional banks to
the tracking list below.
-- So we don’t lose focus . . . the infamous 16, involved,
international banks are:
- Barclays [UK] – US$454M fine [550]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- Bank of America [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- BTMU [Japan] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Citigroup [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Credit Suisse [Switzerland] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Deutsche Bank [Germany] – US$654M LIBOR profit [578]; set aside €500M (US$641M) for LIBOR liability [589]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- Lloyds TSB [UK]
- HSBC [UK] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- HBOS [UK]
- JPMorgan Chase [U.S.] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Norinchuckin [Japan]
- Rabobank [Netherlands]
- RBC [Canada]
- RBS [UK] – £390M (US$612.6M) in fines, 21 employees involved [582]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- UBS [Switzerland] – US$1.5B fine, two charged [575]; Singapore sanctions [600]
- West LB [Germany]
Added to the list by the Monetary Authority of Singapore [600]:
- ING [Netherlands] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- BNP Paribas [France] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Crédit Agricole [France] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- DBS [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Standard Chartered [UK] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- United Overseas Bank [Singapore] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. [Australia] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Macquarie [Australia] – Singapore sanctions [600]
- Commerzbank [Germany] – Singapore sanctions [600]
I trust none of us will lose sight of what these banks have
done.
Comments
and contributions from Update no.599:
“I like Sen. Warren's ideas on banking. Too big to fail is
also too big to manage and too big to regulate.”
From the attachment:
“Look, I’m somebody who believes we really should have
boring banking. That banking
should be – the part that’s about savings accounts and checking accounts and
our money system – should be separated from the kind of risk-taking that Wall
Street traders want to take. That
was originally what the Glass-Steagall Act was about, it was repealed in 1999. There was an effort to get it into
Dodd-Frank in the 2010 bill. That
effort failed. I think we really
do need that kind of separation.
We need to go back to boring banking. The who want to take risks need to take risks with their own
money and do it somewhere else.”
-- Elizabeth Warren.
{NOTE: The Glass-Steagall Act to which she refers is
actually the Banking Act of 1933 [PL
73-066; 48 Stat. 162; 16.June.1933]; and Dodd-Frank
is actually the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act [PL 111-203;
H.R.4173; 124 Stat. 1376; 21.July.2010].}
My reply:
Spot
on, I’d say. Boring banking
indeed! Precisely my position as
well.
P.S.: The banking system is comprised of public sector as
well as commercial for profit enterprises and is an essential element of
infrastructure in business and commerce.
Without a strong, stable, reliable and dependable banking system, the
process of modern business will break down. We received a stark wake-up call in 2008. Dodd-Frank is woefully inadequate, and
we still have these damnable, too-big-to-fail banks that have already returned
to risky business by gambling with other people’s money along with the integrity
of the whole banking system.
Another contribution:
“You are right on with Snowden. He is clearly a traitor if he has done what he claims (and I
believe he has and he is) and I hope we do get him and quickly prosecute him to
the fullest extent. It doesn’t go
unnoticed that the last traitor in a similar way, Mr. Wikileaks is STILL
awaiting justice. What takes so
long? And meanwhile, where is the deterrent to those who have similar warped judgment.
“You are also right that a bigger question is how to fix the
processes that should have caught an 'exception' like Snowden. Fool me once.... or so the line goes.”
My response:
I
imagine many of these traitors, betrayers, and so-called whistleblowers are
driven by some self-obsessed noble purpose, perhaps we could call it the
superman complex; they convince themselves the government is wrong no matter
what it does and it is their duty to expose the wrong-do’ers in the nasty
government.
Intellectually,
the question of whether a traitor’s actions are noble whistle-blowing or
treason depends on public reaction.
So far, I would say Snowden is not faring so well. Independent of Snowden’s actions, the
challenge for citizens with trusted access is how to handle situations where
they believe the government is wrong, e.g., Daniel Ellsberg. It is quite a conundrum.
I’m
fairly certain there will be a comprehensive examination of need-to-know
access. I still can’t imagine how
a computer contractor got access to SCI like PRISM.
A different
contribution:
“Holy cow-- I didn't even notice the 'skin pigments' in the
Cheerios ad. BTW, Cheerios should
have a tie-in ad to the new "Lone Ranger" movie coming out. Cheerios was the long-time radio and TV
sponsor of the show when we were kids!”
My reply:
Yeah,
I watch that commercial so many times, and I think about those damnable racist
comments . . . angers me to no end.
I want to confront those idiots to ask them what the freak they are
thinking. All I see is such a
beautiful, little girl in that flood of ugly comments.
Good
point about the “Lone Ranger.”
Makes me want to go buy a whole case of Cheerios.
Another contribution:
“Reference the on-going hoopla regarding the government's
electronic surveillance activities, I would like to add a resounding ‘AMEN’ to
your sentiment of ‘I am far more concerned about the protection of SCI than I
am the government’s surveillance effort’.
“The potential damage that this man has done will never be
fully appreciated by the public.”
An interesting query:
“I noted your current Update is no.599. I am curious
what your plan of attack is for your Update 67 weeks from now, on September 22,
2014, when your weekly Update will be no.666? I find it ironic your
Update #666 falls one day prior to the Fall Equinox.
“My job is strategic planning & paranoia.”
My response:
Well,
now, interesting question. First,
no plan as yet. Second, if I was a
superstitious man or a believer in the literal interpretation of the Book of
Revelations, I might consider skipping Update no.666, in similar fashion as
more than a few tall buildings have no floor numbered 13 [they have a 13th
floor; they just don’t call it by that number]. I suppose for those concerned about such things, they should
skip reading the Update that week.
Comment to the Blog:
“This comment arrives late. For that and other reasons, it
will be brief as well.
“Rather than debate the general intelligence issues again,
I'll emphasize another issue you mentioned. When did the government acquire
that misplaced confidence in private contractors that allowed Mr. Snowden
access to large amounts of sensitive information? Methinks the Ayn Rand nutbars
have completed their takeover of the government.”
My response to the
Blog:
Re:
“contractors.” OMG, spot on,
brother! I understand the need to supplement,
permanent, active employees, but for the life of me, I do not understand how a
contractor is given access to SCI-compartmented information. He was not an employee of the NSA or
the United States Government; he was an employee of a commercial consulting
company. Someone has some major
splainin’ to do.
My very best wishes to all. Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
Cap, you get the message of Snowden’s action and point it out. The potential for abuse is staggering. Then you insist he has committed treason. Is that not a conflict? My opinion is that he acted on his conscience at great cost to himself in order to try to end the tyrannous government I keep hearing from gun owners might be in the future. It’s already here, y’all missed it, and he’s trying to do something about it.
Bishop Spong points out some saner positions for Christians. His scope, for me, remains within the Judeo-Christian outlook rather than covering “religion” in general, but it’s a good job all the same.
I tend to oppose patenting any part of humans, but this is a new and extremely complex field of law. I do not look forward to the tangles that will result from this particular branch of medicine/technology.
Calvin,
Re: Snowden’s treason. No. I see no conflict. I accept that individuals within the government may have a crisis of conscience regarding the work they are doing, or the orders they are given to execute. There is an established process to raise issues with the government’s conduct. Snowden did not avail himself of that process. He unilaterally chose to betray his oath, his country, and the very people he claims to acting on behalf of in this instance. Snowden chose to act as prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner. There is no way on God’s little green earth his actions were noble, even if the government was tyrannical, which I do not agree to either. He may be trying to do something, but it is not to help We, the People. I see his actions as narcissistic, egocentric, self-serving, and otherwise a betrayal of the trust placed in him. He placed himself above all others in the determination of right and wrong. I am critical of the government, of various administrations, and of agents, but I do not betray this Grand Republic.
Re: Spong. Early on, he refers to “all religions,” and yet he speaks from his Episcopal education, experience and background; so, it should not be surprising that he speaks from his Christian foundation. His basic premise remains valid & accurate – religion is about control.
Re: patenting DNA. I have not read the Supremes’ reasoning, as yet. This arena is only one of a myriad of complicated, human technical issues. I have not read the Myriad Genetics case, yet, but I will.
“That’s just my opinion, but I could be wrong.”
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment