Update from the
Heartland
No.778
7.11.16 – 13.11.16
Blog version: http://heartlandupdate.blogspot.com/
To all,
As
fate and timing would have it, Jeanne and I made our semi-annual journey south
to Austin, for a long weekend visit with our middle son and his family. Friday was Veteran’s Day (Remembrance
Day). Our grandson invited us to
attend the Dripping Springs Elementary School Veteran’s Day celebration. In a very nice touch, the students who
had veterans in attendance handed each veteran a handcrafted remembrance
poppy. Judson said, “A poppy for
Poppi.” The gesture was very
touching to me, since I know the history and significance of the poppy. Judson understood some of the
importance, but he is only in the 4th grade, so I had to cut him
some slack, and I did not really want to get into the details of Flanders
Fields. In the category of
it’s-never-too-late-to-learn, I pedantically experienced the Texas Pledge
of Allegiance to the state flag.
"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge
allegiance to thee, Texas,
one state under God, one and
indivisible."
I subsequently learned, the state legislature created the
original pledge by statute in 1933, and specifically recognized the 1836
Republic of Texas national flag (an implicit statement). We live and learn. For the record, I did not recite that
pledge.
In
the afternoon, Jeanne and I made our way to the Harry Ransom Humanities Research
Center (HRC) at the University of Texas, Austin, to register and complete
orientation for my independent researcher credentials. Why, you may ask? Well, as I also learned, Leon Uris
donated his papers to the HRC archive.
My interest in the papers of Leon Uris stems from the very first book I
read just for myself (not school or any other stimulant) – “Battle
Cry” by Leon Uris (1953).
I credit Uris and that book with my interest in historical fiction
novels, and I like to think, in my passion for writing as well. The book was probably a bit rich for my
12-year-old awareness, but I am not cognizant of any damage done to my
character or psyche. In fact, I
should also give Uris credit at least in part for my service as a Marine. Once a Marine, always a Marine! Uris was a proud Marine who survived
combat during the difficult Battle of Guadalcanal (1942/43). I have read nearly all of his books: “Exodus,”
“Mila
18,” “Armageddon,” “Trinity,” among many others. Anyway, I suspect I might find some
important research material in his papers that might be applicable to my work;
we shall see. I did not have time
to begin my exploration, but at least I am now certified to access his papers
(at some future opportunity).
Friday
evening, Melissa and Tyson went to a concert in Austin with friends – Gogol
Bordello (I had never heard of them).
We stayed home with the kids.
Judson and I had a nice chess match; he is pretty good for nine years of
age. We also watched the U.S.A. v.
Mexico fútbol match – not the outcome we
expected, but still a great match to watch, something exquisite about surgically
precise passing.
On
Saturday, we had the honor of watching Judson’s team play their own fußball match with
a better outcome than the U.S.A. national team.
As
is often our choice, we departed for our return home after we said goodnight to
the grandchildren and they went to bed.
The drive through the night was uneventful. Traffic was slightly greater than usual for that hour of the
night, but thankfully, what traffic there was remained orderly and
respectful. We also had cloudless
clear skies the whole way home with a one-day short of the largest, brightest,
Super Moon in 70 years to light the way.
This
week’s Update is late, but as we say, better late than never. We needed a good nap after arriving
home safely in the early morning hours and retrieving the dogs from the boarding
kennel. They are glad to be home,
as we are. Thank you so much for a
great weekend, Melissa, Tyson, Avalon and Judson.
Well,
wonder of wonders, the sun rose in the east the next morning, as it has done
for the last . . . oh . . . five (5) million years. My hearty congratulations to Donald John Trump, who won the
campaign for the presidency by the very benefit of the rigged electoral system
he has been whining about incessantly for 18 months. Whatever disappointment and/or embarrassment we may suffer
and may have to endure for the next four years, we shall overcome. This too shall pass!
According
to the rules, Trump is actually not president-elect until the Electoral College
convenes in December and the electors cast their ballots in accordance with the
instructions from their respective states. The Electoral College tally per those state rules shows
Trump with a sufficient lead that the formal electoral vote will be (should be)
a pro forma matter.
I
would like to remind everyone that all
of the votes are not yet tallied and that process may take several more
weeks. The results, as of this
writing, indicate that Hillary Clinton won the simple popular vote by a
not-insignificant margin; unfortunately for her campaign, her support was
concentrated in large metropolitan centers and was not spread out sufficiently
across this Grand Republic. Our
electoral process has never been based on a simple, national, popular vote . .
. by design and intention. Those
are the rules.
This
is our Brexit . . . as The Donald accurately predicted. I can only hope soon-to-be President-elect
Trump amazes us all and becomes the leader we all need him to be, not just the
dictator some of us wish him to be.
We have endured a horrific silly-season, and I sure as hell hope he
makes it worth all that pain and agony.
The eternal optimist in me remains hopeful.
I
am reminded of the Cornish proverb:
“From ghoulies and
ghosties and long-leggety beasties
And things that go
bump in the night, Good Lord deliver us!”
For
those who supported the “Manhattan Mussolini,” I offer one piece of counsel, gloating
in victory is NOT becoming! You
should be humble in your victory and continually remind yourselves of the
slave’s admonition to the Roman emperors – all fame is fleeting!
An
exchange below with a friend and frequent contributor may be illuminating.
This
exchange may prove useful. There
are more than a few contributors to this humble forum that enthusiastically
supported Trump in the election.
This thread is but one.
“Looks like Trump is our next PREZ.‚ And Repubs hold Congress
& Senate.
“Who's ready to join me in a VICTORY DANCE?”
. . . to which I
replied:
Gloating
is NOT becoming.
. . . the contributor’s response:
“Is it ok if I start
throwing eggs at Obama and all his progressives who have helped to destroy
America (and our world)???????
“I agree, but I do believe Obama has done immeasurable damage to
our country and world, whether through direct/indirect action, or his inaction.
“Isn't it ok if I
hate someone who I think is treasonous?”
. . . my
follow-up reply:
Hate
is a very strong word.
We
shall respectfully disagree. Treason is a very clear legal term, which I do
believe is erroneously applied in this context. But hey, that's just me.
. . . Round
three:
“I agree, ‘hate’ is a strong word and an emotion I really most often
in life do not ever have.
“My belief though is that Obama is let's say a traitor to our country
and Constitution, evidenced from day#1 when he assumed office.
“Did you know on my MS spell checker, every time I do a spell check
and it comes across Obama, it wants to correct the word to mamba. Isn't a mamba the most venomous snake
in the world? Or, it could be the
Black Mamba, is the deadliest, versus common Green Mamba. Given my fears of Obama & Cabal, I
would not be surprised anything could happen between now and Trump being sworn
into office. That’s the scary part
for me.
“On ‘treason,’ the American Heritage Dictionary defines it as follows:
“trea·son (trēzən) n.
“1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign,
especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by
consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
“2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.
“So, on the definition above, I do find Obama & Cartel, GUILTY.
But that is not up to me, and I
doubt the AG or DOJ will ever take that position, since political institutions
don’t act in concert with the old days of trying someone who commits treason
(or is a traitor).
“I'm sure you do not agree, and I realize my charge is strong, but
we would never have had nearly eight-years of Obama and his socialist/Marxist
gang, and all the damage done to USA and our world, had someone kept him from
being installed in the highest office in the most influential and strong
country in the world, par to the ancient Roman Empire.
“If the Hillary supporters are angry, they cannot be angry at those
wanting to take our country back, but they should be angry at their master,
Obama, because his total failure in leadership (360d) in my humble opinion, is
exactly the reason Hillary could not get in, and Trump did. It did not help Hillary to have the trail
of corruption going all the way back to her law firm and Bill's 2 terms.”
. . . my reply
to round three:
I
am not going to engage in a tête-à-tête with
you (or anyone else) over the definition of treason, or the application of the
word and legal term in this context.
Clearly, you believe he has harmed this country, and I do not believe
so.
Barack
Hussein Obama is a good man, with a kind heart and spirit, who has conducted
himself with dignity, humility, grace, and respect for those who do not agree
with him. I certainly do not agree
with many of his actions as President, but he has been and remains the
President of the United States of America, duly elected twice. He
deserves our respect for that.
I
am left with the impression that you choose to apply the word treason to anyone
who does not agree with you, or you do not agree with in principle. In that sense, perhaps you are using
the term treasonous with respect to my opinions, since we do occasionally
disagree on matters of principle or policy. You have not used that term with me directly or to my face,
but perhaps in other forums I am not a party to. If so, that is your choice. Respectfully, questioning the President’s allegiance to this
Grand Republic and the general well-being of ALL American citizens is wrong,
divisive and actually anti-American . . . yet indicative of the times in which
we live.
I
do not question your allegiance or loyalty to this Grand Republic, even though
we fundamentally disagree on the conduct and performance of the President. C’est la vie!
May
God bless the United States of America.
The nation is bigger than all of us.
. . . to which
I added:
Clinton
won the popular vote. By the time
the total vote is finally tallied, I suspect her margin will not be
trivial. The irony here is the
very rules Trump whined incessantly about being rigged were the very rules that
got him elected as president. We
have never had (and I respectfully believe should never have) a simple direct
national popular vote. States
matter for a host of reasons based on the essential principles that founded
this Grand Republic. So, it is
understandable that the majority, who lost this election, are a bit upset about
that reality. Let us give them
their due.
. . . Round
four:
“I appreciate you taking the time and energy to explain your
position and opinion, though I would offer, many might disagree (at least those
types that read my posts).
“Obama has harmed many people I know directly: I know people who had their hours cut
back to under I believe 27 per week, because the employer did not want to
participate in ACA or Obamacare. For
those people, going from 40 to 25 hours a week, was very damaging to their
cash-flow and capacity to survive in an already very expensive city to live in
(San Diego). So I guess
Obama was not responsible for that.
“Do you know Obama personally, or are you going off your
intuition, are you basing your observations based on what?
"I already gave the definition of ‘treason’ [above], and will stand by that:
“1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign,
especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by
consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies
“2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.
“Hopefully sooner-than-later we shall find out who has been
funding ISIS. If Obama had
knowledge that we are funding a terrorist entity, then does that make him
guilty of treason?
“I am surprised since you have a son in law enforcement, that you
do not automatically see how divisive Obama has been for nearly 8-years on race
relations and turning a targeted segment, against cops. Cops are not always
right on their use-of-force, but most cops I know, they cannot stand Obama
because they too feel he has had something out for them (along with Eric
Holder).
“Obama has not at all been a leader, he has been a divider and
dark cloud on our nation. As much
as both of us may not like Trump's style and at times insulting others, at
least I think he has the capacity (unlike Obama) to inspire us for a better way
and better times.
“As evidenced by Russia already stating they want to renew a good relationship
with America, due to Trump's election, makes me have more hope than 2-days
ago. Hopefully it is not a
ruse. But under Obama, our
relationships with many countries/players, has deteriorated to levels I never
witnessed in my lifetime before.
“That being said, we agree to disagree but our friendship remains.
Love you brother and thank you for your service in USMC!!!!”
. . . my reply
to round four:
Wow! So, President Obama is responsible for
cutting back working hours of individual citizens. I never knew he (or any president) had that kind of
power. You live and learn, I
suppose.
Let’s
be clear and factual, shall we. PPACA
was created and passed by both chambers of Congress. PPACA is NOT an executive order. Please note the recorded congressional votes for the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [PL 111-148; H.R. 3590; House:
219-212-0-0(4); Senate: 60-39-0-1(0); 124 Stat. 119; 23.March.2010] [432]. I make no claim and offer no defense that PPACA is perfect;
far from it; however, it was a noble attempt to provide needed health care for
millions of lower income citizens.
I am all for improving it.
I’m not in favor of rejecting it outright without a better system to
replace it. I will never support
the foolish Republican position, as it is on so many issues . . . first my way,
and then we might consider your concerns.
I
know the definition of treason. I
know what the Constitution says about treason. I also know what the Supreme Court has said about treason,
as well. So, let us stick to
substantiated facts rather than succumb to emotional parochial partisan party
politics. I understand and accept
that you and others do not like President Obama; however, your dislike (for
whatever reasons) does NOT constitute treason . . . no matter how many times
you say it.
Yes,
I have a son in law enforcement.
He does not see President Obama in the same tainted light that you
apparently do. In fact, I (we) see
President Obama’s efforts to bridge the racial divide and heal the racial
wounds that have festered in this Grand Republic for centuries. He has attempted to walk a very fine
line . . . and done it admirably.
Why
do you think Putin and Russia were so against Obama & Clinton . . . because
they were such patsies and push-overs?
Really? And, why do you
think he loves Trump so much? . .
. because Trump is going to stand up to Russia’s hegemonic efforts to dominate
her neighbors? Really?
Yes,
we shall respectfully disagree.
That is the beauty of a free society. It has been my honor to serve this Grand Republic . . .
despite our many warts, flaws, wounds and egomaniacal leaders.
Semper Fidelis,
Cap
FYI: the exchanged continued with other Trump supporters
chiming in; however, this should suffice to reflect the depth of emotions
associated with our current president and the de facto hope the “Manhattan Mussolini” will remedy all the ills we
suffer in this Grand Republic.
After all, he publicly proclaimed for the nation and the world, “I alone
can fix it.” We shall soon see how
he intends to deliver on his proclamation. I will be watching very carefully for his contemporary
version of The Enabling Act of 1933.
Comments and contributions from Update no.777:
Comment to the Blog:
“I share your wish that the press would cover ‘third party’
candidates who have enough ballot presence to possibly win. I suspect the news sources no longer
feel a need to compete with each other due to the consolidation among their
operations. In any case, they have done the nation a disservice by failing to
cover alternatives to the stinking ‘major party’ candidates.
“I write this the day before ‘Election Day,’ having voted a few
weeks ago. It fascinates me that
turnout has been very high for that. As I read your post, I listened to the local CBS station
report that waiting times have been over an hour at the early voting location,
which is quite large. The NBC
affiliate reported the same story last night. What makes that so interesting is
the unpopularity of the Republican and Democratic candidates. Are people that eager to vote their
fears, or is something else happening? As you point out, we have no way of knowing today. Party affiliation could be meaningless,
and I'm sure independents are voting early as well. Most of the voters the two stations interviewed gave no hint
of how they'd voted.
“A potential local factor not mentioned on TV is that polling
places were moved, at least for my precinct, in late September. Mine was moved
to a place I cannot reach unless the weather is nice enough to ride my bicycle
there. That factored into my early voting decision; I reached the early voting
location by bus.
“If this election is ‘rigged’ at all, it will be through such
maneuvers as that, not through people voting more than once or computer
hacking. We have a precedent for
that kind of chicanery in Ohio in the messy election of 2004. My clergy person endured several hours
of waiting that time, and so did many others voting in lower-income areas. Others gave up. Various other games, such as poll
workers telling people to vote in some other precinct, played out as well. I would like to have poll watchers and
other outside scrutiny via the United Nations.”
My response to the
Blog:
Thank
you for your observations. I share
your concerns.
One
of my very serious concerns is de facto
voter suppression efforts. To me,
long lines at polling stations are one of many voter suppression efforts, and an
indictment of state and local governments for their failure to fulfill the most
basic of governmental functions – voting by ALL eligible citizens. I shall have a first hand observation
of our local voting process tomorrow.
I am retired (self-employed, perhaps), so I plan to vote after my late
morning nap – my first time with a mid-day vote. I expect little to no lines. Previous times, the bottleneck was the registration
check. I do not recall ever
waiting for an actual ballot station.
We seem to have sufficient quantities and locations of polling
stations. Mine has remained the
same for the duration of our present residence, and it is close enough I could
walk – a little over a mile. We
shall see.
If
one voter gives up, or does not vote because of any number of obstacles,
government has failed. Such
obstructive conduct should never be tolerated.
P.S.: I voted at 13:00 CST, Tuesday, 8.November.2016. There was not one person in front of me
upon my arrival at the polling station . . . at either the registration check
desk or the actual voting machine.
The machine I used was a simple touch-screen device with the coded paper
tape created in parallel, as I voted.
I was impressed.
My
very best wishes to all. Take care
of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap :-)
2 comments:
It's been an interesting week. I too have noticed the level of passion of Trump's supporters, but it is exceeded by their level of misinformation and the utter failures of their logic. These are the same people who "knew" that President Obama would confiscate their firearms. As with the rest of their paranoid fantasies/nightmares, it's all in their heads. I would, however, like to know who is making money on these people.
Following the news has become an exercise in the surreal. President-elect Trump has been "walking back" on so many of his campaign promises so quickly that someone has suggested he can do the moon walk dance as well as Michael Jackson.
On an even stranger note, Trump stated in a 60 Minutes interview that he does not support the Electoral College, the source of his victory. Could those suggesting the whole race was a conspiracy to elect Hillary Clinton be right after all? Given Trump's track record in the business world, it would not surprise me to see him fail even at that. Perhaps Mr. Trump has realized the depth of his inability to do the job for which he was elected. I take nothing for granted.
Calvin,
As the old Chinese curse goes, may you live in interesting times. Interesting times. One of Goebbels’ principles of propaganda: tell a lie enough times and most people will believe it.
That “walking back” has occurred for every president. I wonder if his supporters and those who voted for him will accept or tolerate that “walking back” process?
We were on the road, so I have not seen the 60 Minutes interview; but, I have recorded it on DVR. I will watch it over the next few days.
Thank you for sharing your opinions.
Cheers,
Cap
Post a Comment