12 October 2015

Update no.721

Update from the Heartland
No.721
5.10.15 – 11.10.15
To all,

            The follow-up news items:
-- Who knows what to believe in the public reports regarding the Russian injection into Syria?  [718, 720] Additional perspective is offered in the Comment Section below.  The Russian released to the public video clips of them launching cruise missiles from ships in the Caspian Sea.  At first, I thought that had to be a mistake; there cannot be much of a naval threat in the Caspian Sea.  They fired over Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and into Syria . . . at least that is what the Russians claimed.  The United States reported a handful of the Russian missiles landed short of their targets in Iran and Iraq . . . that is presuming they were all intended for Syria; to be blunt, they could shoot at anything they wish and claim an errant weapon.  We have to hand it to the Russians.  By bold, audacious action, they are dictating military operations in Syria, and we are closer to direct conflict with the Russians, or losing whatever modicum of influence we had in the region.
            Two relevant, related opinions (in addition to those offered below):
** “Kremlin Says Russian ‘Volunteer’ Forces Will Fight in Syria”
by Andrew E. Kramer, Helene Cooper  and Ceylan Yeginsu
New York Times
Published: OCT. 5, 2015
** “How America can counter Putin’s moves in Syria”
by Condoleezza Rice and Robert M. Gates
Washington Post
Published: October 8, 2015
-- Now, we hear the Umpqua Community College shooter [720] was discharged from Army basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, after just one month in 2008, apparently for attempting to commit suicide.  So, here is yet another perfect example of our inability to collect domestic intelligence information on troubled or disturbed citizens and translate that intelligence into preemptive action to avoid violent events.  Further, our appalling mental health treatment capacity in this Grand Republic seriously complicates, if not nullifies, any effort to keep firearms out of the hands of mentally ill, disturbed, or violence prone citizens.  We must find a fair and constitutional means to keep firearms from unstable individuals, and if that means removing and prohibiting the possession of firearms in the residence of citizens who harbor unstable citizens, then so be it.  Yet, I maintain my opinion, any further restriction of firearms possession must be linked concomitantly to intelligence on and treatment for the mentally ill and other threatening or unstable individuals.
            With that said, I must note here that we have repeatedly seen that flawed citizens occupy government positions, and have consistently proven themselves incapable of resisting political pressure to use sensitive information collected by the government for political purposes, e.g, IRS against minority political parties, terrorism intelligence surveillance information to discredit Elliott Spitzer, et al ad infinitum ad nauseum.  Abuse of mental illness information will further stigmatize the mentally ill and ostracize them, which in turn will create even greater resistance to treatment or even identification. 

            Comments and contributions from Update no.720:
“On the Russian air strikes in Syria, be cautious when reading about who is being hit.  The Russians say they are hitting ISIS/ISIL targets – Western media says they are hitting ‘moderate Syrians’.  Not sure who these ‘moderates’ are.   Apparently some in the Beltway and neocon community think that AQ is a ‘moderate’ in Syria and advocate helping them.  This is the same AQ that attacked us on 9/11!  Totally insane – and there are reports that one of our agencies is actually helping AQ.   Below is from a blog regarding this. On FOX this weekend a retired general was using a map to describe the situation- at one point he had the pointer on the ISIL blob and called them ‘our allies.’- That is a good analogy for what is going on.
From Colonel Pat Lang’s Blog:
"... in recent months, the Israeli government and its American neoconservative allies have been floating trial balloons regarding whether Al Qaeda could be repackaged as Sunni "moderates" and become a de facto U.S. ally in achieving a "regime change" in Syria, ousting President Bashar al-Assad who has been near the top of the Israeli/neocon hit list for years.
“A key neocon propaganda theme has been to spin the conspiracy theory that Assad and the Islamic State are somehow in cahoots and thus Al Qaeda represents the lesser evil. Though there is no evidence to support this conspiracy theory, it was even raised by Charlie Rose in his "60 Minutes" interview last Sunday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The reality is that the Islamic State and Al Qaeda have both been leading the fight to destroy the secular Assad government, which has fought back against both groups.
And, if these two leading terror groups saw a chance to raise their black flags over Damascus, they might well mend their tactical rifts. They would have much to gain by overthrowing Assad's regime, which is the principal protector of Syria's Christians, Alawites, Shiites and other ‘heretics.’"  (emphasis in original)
 . . . to which was added:
“More on the ‘moderates’ myth
[Also from Colonel Pat Lang’s Blog:]
New evidence of alliance between "moderates" and Jihadis.
“Meanwhile, further evidence has surfaced, confirming collusion of so-called "moderates" with Salafi/Jihadi groups. Indeed, the rebel factions in the Rastan enclave have now established another "joint operations room" (sort of a command and control centre), in which remnants of FSA units will join hard-core "Jabhat al-Nusra" (JaN) and "Ahrar al-Sham" representatives.
“While last week's reports in the mainstream media were buzzing with statements by rebel commander Jamil al-Saleh, according to which there were no Jihadis in his area, it now turns out that his troops have entered into a tactical alliance with the same Jihadis he claimed were not even there in the first place.
“This new piece of evidence should be another blow for the still popular myth of the "moderate" rebels. In particular, new terminology used by Beltway experts and DC officials, calling the radicals "Islamic conservatives" or "Islamic nationalists", can now be seen as the plain repackaging effort it has been since its inception.
“In addition to Jihadi heavyweights "Jabhat al-Nusra" and "Ahrar al-Sham", the Rastan "joint operations room" regroups "Faylaq al-Homs" and "Jaish al-Tawhid". As previously stated, names don't really matter that much when it comes to Syrian rebels and JaN's ascendancy in terms of "command and control" and "force multiplier" can be taken for granted.” (emphasis in original)

            My very best wishes to all.  Take care of yourselves and each other.
Cheers,
Cap                        :-)

No comments: